Literature DB >> 21732745

The challenge and importance of standardizing pre-analytical variables in surgical pathology specimens for clinical care and translational research.

D G Hicks1, B F Boyce.   

Abstract

The introduction of targeted cancer therapies into clinical practice, in which patients are selected for novel treatments based on results of companion molecular testing of their tumor specimens, has created significant new challenges for the surgical pathology laboratory. These include standardization of tissue handling and sample preparation with accurate documentation to ensure optimal quality of clinical samples to reduce the risk of errors in molecular biology tests. The assay of tumor tissues for biomarkers that can provide predictive data for prognosis or treatment should enable selection of the most appropriate therapies (Yaziji et al. 2008, Hicks and Kulkarni 2008). Major advances have been made in the ability to profile clinical samples for research at the DNA, RNA and protein levels. To translate this new information into the clinical setting, however, the quality of the starting material, in this case the tumor tissue, determines the accuracy and reliability of companion diagnostic assay results and therefore optimal therapeutic strategies. Inaccurate results owing to compromised tissue quality can lead to false positive or false negative results with therapeutic consequences that can harm patients and affect their eventual outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21732745     DOI: 10.3109/10520295.2011.591832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotech Histochem        ISSN: 1052-0295            Impact factor:   1.718


  19 in total

1.  SDHB/SDHA immunohistochemistry in pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas: a multicenter interobserver variation analysis using virtual microscopy: a Multinational Study of the European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumors (ENS@T).

Authors:  Thomas G Papathomas; Lindsey Oudijk; Alexandre Persu; Anthony J Gill; Francien van Nederveen; Arthur S Tischler; Frédérique Tissier; Marco Volante; Xavier Matias-Guiu; Marcel Smid; Judith Favier; Elena Rapizzi; Rosella Libe; Maria Currás-Freixes; Selda Aydin; Thanh Huynh; Urs Lichtenauer; Anouk van Berkel; Letizia Canu; Rita Domingues; Roderick J Clifton-Bligh; Magdalena Bialas; Miikka Vikkula; Gustavo Baretton; Mauro Papotti; Gabriella Nesi; Cécile Badoual; Karel Pacak; Graeme Eisenhofer; Henri J Timmers; Felix Beuschlein; Jérôme Bertherat; Massimo Mannelli; Mercedes Robledo; Anne-Paule Gimenez-Roqueplo; Winand Nm Dinjens; Esther Korpershoek; Ronald R de Krijger
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Use of modified Magee equations and histologic criteria to predict the Oncotype DX recurrence score.

Authors:  Bradley M Turner; Kristin A Skinner; Ping Tang; Mary C Jackson; Nyrie Soukiazian; Michelle Shayne; Alissa Huston; Marilyn Ling; David G Hicks
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  -Omics and cancer biomarkers: link to the biological truth or bear the consequences.

Authors:  Lance A Liotta; Emanuel F Petricoin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Longitudinal molecular characterization of endoscopic specimens from colorectal lesions.

Authors:  Petra Minarikova; Lucie Benesova; Tereza Halkova; Barbora Belsanova; Stepan Suchanek; Jiri Cyrany; Inna Tuckova; Jan Bures; Miroslav Zavoral; Marek Minarik
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Novel neoadjuvant therapy paradigms for bladder cancer: results from the National Cancer Center Institute Forum.

Authors:  Colin P N Dinney; Donna Hansel; David McConkey; William Shipley; Michael Hagan; Robert Dreicer; Seth Lerner; Bogdan Czerniak; Fred Waldman; Susan Groshen; Lawrence D True; Emanuel Petricoin; Dan Theodorescu; Andrew Hruszkewycz; Dean Bajorin
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 3.498

6.  The Impact of Pre-analytical Quality Initiatives on Cholangiocarcinoma Diagnostics in Thailand.

Authors:  Supinda Koonmee; Sakkarn Sangkhamanon; Piyapharom Intarawichian; Chaiwat Aphivatanasiri; Waritta Kunprom; Prakasit Sa-Ngiamwibool; Suwit Balthaisong; Chitsakul Phuyao; Piya Prajumwongs; Reza Alaghehbandan; Malinee Thanee
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-06-10

7.  Qualifying antibodies for image-based immune profiling and multiplexed tissue imaging.

Authors:  Ziming Du; Jia-Ren Lin; Rumana Rashid; Zoltan Maliga; Shu Wang; Jon C Aster; Benjamin Izar; Peter K Sorger; Sandro Santagata
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 13.491

8.  A tissue quality index: an intrinsic control for measurement of effects of preanalytical variables on FFPE tissue.

Authors:  Veronique M Neumeister; Fabio Parisi; Allison M England; Summar Siddiqui; Valsamo Anagnostou; Elizabeth Zarrella; Maria Vassilakopolou; Yalai Bai; Sasha Saylor; Anna Sapino; Yuval Kluger; David G Hicks; Gianni Bussolati; Stephanie Kwei; David L Rimm
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 5.662

9.  Automated quantitative multiplex immunofluorescence in situ imaging identifies phospho-S6 and phospho-PRAS40 as predictive protein biomarkers for prostate cancer lethality.

Authors:  Michail Shipitsin; Clayton Small; Eldar Giladi; Summar Siddiqui; Sibgat Choudhury; Sadiq Hussain; Yi E Huang; Hua Chang; David L Rimm; David M Berman; Thomas P Nifong; Peter Blume-Jensen
Journal:  Proteome Sci       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 2.480

Review 10.  Guidance for laboratories performing molecular pathology for cancer patients.

Authors:  Ian A Cree; Zandra Deans; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg; Nicola Normanno; Anders Edsjö; Etienne Rouleau; Francesc Solé; Erik Thunnissen; Wim Timens; Ed Schuuring; Elisabeth Dequeker; Samuel Murray; Manfred Dietel; Patricia Groenen; J Han Van Krieken
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.