PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the significance of 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in the assessment of the therapeutic response to 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) in malignant phaeochromocytoma. METHODS: We reviewed the records of 11 patients (7 men and 4 women) with malignant phaeochromocytoma who underwent 131I-MIBG therapy (100-200 mCi). 18F-FDG PET and serum catecholamine assays were performed 3 months before and after the first dose of 131I-MIBG. FDG uptake was evaluated in the observed lesions using the maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax). The average SUVmax of all lesions (ASUV) was calculated. If more than five lesions were identified, the average SUVmax of the five highest SUVmax (ASUV5) was calculated. The ratio of pre- and post-therapy values was calculated for the highest SUVmax (rMSUV), ASUV (rASUV), ASUV5 (rASUV5), CT diameter (rCT) and serum catecholamine (rCA). Responder (R) and non-responder (NR) groups were defined after a clinical follow-up of at least 6 months according to changes in symptoms, CT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 123I-MIBG scan. RESULTS: Post-therapy evaluation revealed five R and six NR patients. The size of the target lesions was not significantly different before and after therapy (p>0.05). However, ASUV and ASUV5 were significantly lower in the R group (rASUV 0.64±0.18, rASUV5 0.68±0.17) compared to the NR group (rASUV 1.40±0.54, rASUV5 1.37±0.61) (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: 18F-FDG PET can be potentially used to evaluate the response of malignant phaeochromocytoma to 131I-MIBG therapy.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the significance of 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in the assessment of the therapeutic response to 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) in malignant phaeochromocytoma. METHODS: We reviewed the records of 11 patients (7 men and 4 women) with malignant phaeochromocytoma who underwent 131I-MIBG therapy (100-200 mCi). 18F-FDG PET and serum catecholamine assays were performed 3 months before and after the first dose of 131I-MIBG. FDG uptake was evaluated in the observed lesions using the maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax). The average SUVmax of all lesions (ASUV) was calculated. If more than five lesions were identified, the average SUVmax of the five highest SUVmax (ASUV5) was calculated. The ratio of pre- and post-therapy values was calculated for the highest SUVmax (rMSUV), ASUV (rASUV), ASUV5 (rASUV5), CT diameter (rCT) and serum catecholamine (rCA). Responder (R) and non-responder (NR) groups were defined after a clinical follow-up of at least 6 months according to changes in symptoms, CT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 123I-MIBG scan. RESULTS: Post-therapy evaluation revealed five R and six NR patients. The size of the target lesions was not significantly different before and after therapy (p>0.05). However, ASUV and ASUV5 were significantly lower in the R group (rASUV 0.64±0.18, rASUV5 0.68±0.17) compared to the NR group (rASUV 1.40±0.54, rASUV5 1.37±0.61) (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: 18F-FDG PET can be potentially used to evaluate the response of malignant phaeochromocytoma to 131I-MIBG therapy.
Authors: J Sisson; B Shapiro; W H Beierwaltes; M Nakajo; J Glowniak; T Mangner; J E Carey; D P Swanson; J Copp; W Satterlee Journal: Trans Assoc Am Physicians Date: 1983
Authors: Sara Gonias; Robert Goldsby; Katherine K Matthay; Randall Hawkins; David Price; John Huberty; Lloyd Damon; Charles Linker; Aimee Sznewajs; Steve Shiboski; Paul Fitzgerald Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-07-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Graeme Eisenhofer; Stefan R Bornstein; Frederieke M Brouwers; Nai-Kong V Cheung; Patricia L Dahia; Ronald R de Krijger; Thomas J Giordano; Lloyd A Greene; David S Goldstein; Hendrik Lehnert; William M Manger; John M Maris; Hartmut P H Neumann; Karel Pacak; Barry L Shulkin; David I Smith; Arthur S Tischler; William F Young Journal: Endocr Relat Cancer Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 5.678
Authors: David Taïeb; Alexandre Kaliski; Carsten C Boedeker; Victoria Martucci; Tito Fojo; John R Adler; Karel Pacak Journal: Endocr Rev Date: 2014-07-17 Impact factor: 19.871
Authors: Jorge A Carrasquillo; Clara C Chen; Abhishek Jha; Karel Pacak; Daniel A Pryma; Frank I Lin Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2021-09-01 Impact factor: 10.057