Literature DB >> 21731534

Hormesis in Regulatory risk assessment - Science and Science Policy.

George Gray1.   

Abstract

This brief commentary will argue that whether hormesis is considered in regulatory risk assessment is a matter less of science than of science policy. I will first discuss the distinction between science and science policy and their roles in regulatory risk assessment. Then I will focus on factors that influence science policy, especially as it relates to the conduct of risk assessments to inform regulatory decisions, with a focus on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The key questions will then be how does hormesis interact with current concepts of science and science policy for risk assessment? Finally, I look ahead to factors that may increase, or decrease, the likelihood of hormesis being incorporated into regulatory risk assessment.

Keywords:  Hormesis; Risk Assessment; Science Policy

Year:  2010        PMID: 21731534      PMCID: PMC3118765          DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.10-032.Gray

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dose Response        ISSN: 1559-3258            Impact factor:   2.658


  8 in total

Review 1.  Hormesis: a generalizable and unifying hypothesis.

Authors:  E J Calabrese; L A Baldwin
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.635

Review 2.  The occurrence of hormetic dose responses in the toxicological literature, the hormesis database: an overview.

Authors:  Edward J Calabrese; Robyn Blain
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 3.  Risk characterization: A bridge to informed decision making.

Authors:  D W North
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1997-10

4.  A distributional approach to characterizing low-dose cancer risk.

Authors:  J S Evans; J D Graham; G M Gray; R L Sielken
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.000

5.  Risk/risk trade-offs in pesticide regulation: an exploratory analysis of the public health effects of a ban on organophosphate and carbamate pesticides.

Authors:  G M Gray; J K Hammitt
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.000

6.  Fundamental flaws of hormesis for public health decisions.

Authors:  Kristina A Thayer; Ronald Melnick; Kathy Burns; Devra Davis; James Huff
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 7.  Target organs in chronic bioassays of 533 chemical carcinogens.

Authors:  L S Gold; T H Slone; N B Manley; L Bernstein
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 8.  Hormesis and its place in nonmonotonic dose-response relationships: some scientific reality checks.

Authors:  Paul Mushak
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 9.031

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.