OBJECTIVE: To assess epicardial fat volume (EFV), myocardial TG content (MTGC) and metabolic profile in severely obese patients, and to determine whether ectopic fat depots are linked to metabolic disorders or myocardial function. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Sixty-three subjects with normal LV function and no coronary artery disease, including 33 lean (BMI: 21.4 ± 2.0 kg m(-2)) and 30 obese (BMI: 41.8 ± 6 kg m(-2)) patients, underwent 3-T cardiovascular MRI, and anthropometric, biological and visceral abdominal fat (VAT) assessments. EFV was measured by short-axis slice imaging and myocardial (intra-myocellular) TG content was measured by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. RESULTS: EFV and MTGC were positively correlated (r=0.52, P<0.0001), and were both strongly correlated with age, BMI, waist circumference and VAT, but not with severity of obesity. EFV and MTGC were significantly higher in obese patients than in lean controls (141 ± 18 versus 79 ± 7 ml, P=0.0001; 1.0 ± 0.1 versus 0.6 ± 0.1%, P=0.01, respectively), but some differences were found between the two cardiac depots: EFV was higher in diabetic obese subjects as compared with that in non-diabetic obese subjects (213 ± 34 versus 141 ± 18 ml, P=0.03), and was correlated with parameters of glucose tolerance (fasting plasma glucose, insulin and HOMA-IR), whereas MTGC was not. EFV and MTGC were both associated with parameters of lipid profile or inflammation (TGs, CRP). Remarkably, this was VAT-dependent, as only VAT remained independently associated with metabolic parameters (P<0.01). Concerning myocardial function, MTGC was the only parameter independently associated with stroke volume (β=-0.38, P=0.01), suggesting an impact of cardiac steatosis in cardiac function. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that VAT dominates the relationship between EFV, MTGC and metabolic measures, and uncover specific partitioning of cardiac ectopic lipid deposition.
OBJECTIVE: To assess epicardial fat volume (EFV), myocardial TG content (MTGC) and metabolic profile in severely obesepatients, and to determine whether ectopic fat depots are linked to metabolic disorders or myocardial function. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Sixty-three subjects with normal LV function and no coronary artery disease, including 33 lean (BMI: 21.4 ± 2.0 kg m(-2)) and 30 obese (BMI: 41.8 ± 6 kg m(-2)) patients, underwent 3-T cardiovascular MRI, and anthropometric, biological and visceral abdominal fat (VAT) assessments. EFV was measured by short-axis slice imaging and myocardial (intra-myocellular) TG content was measured by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. RESULTS:EFV and MTGC were positively correlated (r=0.52, P<0.0001), and were both strongly correlated with age, BMI, waist circumference and VAT, but not with severity of obesity. EFV and MTGC were significantly higher in obesepatients than in lean controls (141 ± 18 versus 79 ± 7 ml, P=0.0001; 1.0 ± 0.1 versus 0.6 ± 0.1%, P=0.01, respectively), but some differences were found between the two cardiac depots: EFV was higher in diabetic obese subjects as compared with that in non-diabetic obese subjects (213 ± 34 versus 141 ± 18 ml, P=0.03), and was correlated with parameters of glucose tolerance (fasting plasma glucose, insulin and HOMA-IR), whereas MTGC was not. EFV and MTGC were both associated with parameters of lipid profile or inflammation (TGs, CRP). Remarkably, this was VAT-dependent, as only VAT remained independently associated with metabolic parameters (P<0.01). Concerning myocardial function, MTGC was the only parameter independently associated with stroke volume (β=-0.38, P=0.01), suggesting an impact of cardiac steatosis in cardiac function. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that VAT dominates the relationship between EFV, MTGC and metabolic measures, and uncover specific partitioning of cardiac ectopic lipid deposition.
Authors: Chia-Ying Liu; David A Bluemke; Gary Gerstenblith; Stefan L Zimmerman; Ji Li; Hong Zhu; Shenghan Lai; Hong Lai Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2014-01-24 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Tae Hee Ko; Jubert C Marquez; Hyoung Kyu Kim; Seung Hun Jeong; SungRyul Lee; Jae Boum Youm; In Sung Song; Dae Yun Seo; Hye Jin Kim; Du Nam Won; Kyoung Im Cho; Mun Gi Choi; Byoung Doo Rhee; Kyung Soo Ko; Nari Kim; Jong Chul Won; Jin Han Journal: Pflugers Arch Date: 2017-10-14 Impact factor: 3.657
Authors: B Gaborit; I Abdesselam; F Kober; A Jacquier; O Ronsin; O Emungania; N Lesavre; M-C Alessi; J C Martin; M Bernard; A Dutour Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2014-07-21 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Diana K Thiara; Chia Ying Liu; Fabio Raman; Sabrina Mangat; Julia B Purdy; Horacio A Duarte; Nancyanne Schmidt; Jamie Hur; Christopher T Sibley; David A Bluemke; Colleen Hadigan Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2015-05-11 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Ranganath Muniyappa; Radwa Noureldin; Ronald Ouwerkerk; Elizabeth Y Liu; Ritu Madan; Brent S Abel; Katherine Mullins; Mary F Walter; Monica C Skarulis; Ahmed M Gharib Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2015-05-28 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Marie Bayer Elming; Jacob Lønborg; Thomas Rasmussen; Jørgen Tobias Kühl; Thomas Engstrøm; Niels Vejlstrup; Lars Køber; Klaus F Kofoed Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-05-24 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Satyam Sarma; Graeme Carrick-Ranson; Naoki Fujimoto; Beverley Adams-Huet; Paul S Bhella; Jeffrey L Hastings; Keri M Shafer; Shigeki Shibata; Kara Boyd; Dean Palmer; Edward W Szczepaniak; Lidia S Szczepaniak; Benjamin D Levine Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-09-13 Impact factor: 7.792