Literature DB >> 21730944

In vivo electroporation of developing mouse retina.

Jimmy de Melo1, Seth Blackshaw.   

Abstract

The functional characterization of genes expressed during mammalian retinal development remains a significant challenge. Gene targeting to generate constitutive or conditional loss of function knockouts remains cost and labor intensive, as well as time consuming. Adding to these challenges, retina expressed genes may have essential roles outside the retina leading to unintended confounds when using a knockout approach. Furthermore, the ability to ectopically express a gene in a gain of function experiment can be extremely valuable when attempting to identify a role in cell fate specification and/or terminal differentiation. We present a method for the rapid and efficient incorporation of DNA plasmids into the neonatal mouse retina by electroporation. The application of short electrical impulses above a certain field strength results in a transient increase in plasma membrane permeability, facilitating the transfer of material across the membrane (1,2,3,4). Groundbreaking work demonstrated that electroporation could be utilized as a method of gene transfer into mammalian cells by inducing the formation of hydrophilic plasma membrane pores allowing the passage of highly charged DNA through the lipid bilayer (5). Continuous technical development has resulted in the viability of electroporation as a method for in vivo gene transfer in multiple mouse tissues including the retina, the method for which is described herein (6, 7, 8, 9, 10). DNA solution is injected into the subretinal space so that DNA is placed between the retinal pigmented epithelium and retina of the neonatal (P0) mouse and electrical pulses are applied using a tweezer electrode. The lateral placement of the eyes in the mouse allows for the easy orientation of the tweezer electrode to the necessary negative pole-DNA-retina-positive pole alignment. Extensive incorporation and expression of transferred genes can be identified by postnatal day 2 (P2). Due to the lack of significant lateral migration of cells in the retina, electroporated and non-electroporated regions are generated. Non-electroporated regions may serve as internal histological controls where appropriate. Retinal electroporation can be used to express a gene under a ubiquitous promoter, such as CAG, or to disrupt gene function using shRNA constructs or Cre-recombinase. More targeted expression can be achieved by designing constructs with cell specific gene promoters. Visualization of electroporated cells is achieved using bicistronic constructs expressing GFP or by co-electroporating a GFP expression construct. Furthermore, multiple constructs may be electroporated for the study of combinatorial gene effects or simultaneous gain and loss of function of different genes. Retinal electroporation may also be utilized for the analysis of genomic cis-regulatory elements by generating appropriate expression constructs and deletion mutants. Such experiments can be used to identify cis-regulatory regions sufficient or required for cell specific gene expression (11). Potential experiments are limited only by construct availability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21730944      PMCID: PMC3197058          DOI: 10.3791/2847

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  11 in total

Review 1.  Sparking new frontiers: using in vivo electroporation for genetic manipulations.

Authors:  M Swartz; J Eberhart; G S Mastick; C E Krull
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 3.582

2.  The orphan nuclear hormone receptor ERRbeta controls rod photoreceptor survival.

Authors:  Akishi Onishi; Guang-Hua Peng; Erin M Poth; Daniel A Lee; Jichao Chen; Uel Alexis; Jimmy de Melo; Shiming Chen; Seth Blackshaw
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Controlled expression of transgenes introduced by in vivo electroporation.

Authors:  Takahiko Matsuda; Constance L Cepko
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Transcellular ion flow in Escherichia coli B and electrical sizing of bacterias.

Authors:  U Zimmermann; J Schulz; G Pilwat
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Permeability changes induced by electric impulses in vesicular membranes.

Authors:  E Neumann; K Rosenheck
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1972-12-29       Impact factor: 1.843

6.  Letter: An alternate explanation for the permeability changes induced by electrical impulses in vesicular membranes.

Authors:  R J Turnbull
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1973-12-31       Impact factor: 1.843

7.  Pias3-dependent SUMOylation directs rod photoreceptor development.

Authors:  Akishi Onishi; Guang-Hua Peng; Chengda Hsu; Uel Alexis; Shiming Chen; Seth Blackshaw
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Electroporation and RNA interference in the rodent retina in vivo and in vitro.

Authors:  Takahiko Matsuda; Constance L Cepko
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-05       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Gene transfer into mouse lyoma cells by electroporation in high electric fields.

Authors:  E Neumann; M Schaefer-Ridder; Y Wang; P H Hofschneider
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  A core paired-type and POU homeodomain-containing transcription factor program drives retinal bipolar cell gene expression.

Authors:  Douglas S Kim; Takahiko Matsuda; Constance L Cepko
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  13 in total

1.  Lhx2 Is an Essential Factor for Retinal Gliogenesis and Notch Signaling.

Authors:  Jimmy de Melo; Cristina Zibetti; Brian S Clark; Woochang Hwang; Ana L Miranda-Angulo; Jiang Qian; Seth Blackshaw
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  In Vivo Electroporation of Developing Mouse Retina.

Authors:  Jimmy de Melo; Seth Blackshaw
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2018

3.  Prdm1 overexpression causes a photoreceptor fate-shift in nascent, but not mature, bipolar cells.

Authors:  Noah B Goodson; Ko U Park; Jason S Silver; Vince A Chiodo; William W Hauswirth; Joseph A Brzezinski
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 3.582

4.  Constitutive Gαi coupling activity of very large G protein-coupled receptor 1 (VLGR1) and its regulation by PDZD7 protein.

Authors:  Qiao-Xia Hu; Jun-Hong Dong; Hai-Bo Du; Dao-Lai Zhang; Hong-Ze Ren; Ming-Liang Ma; Yuan Cai; Tong-Chao Zhao; Xiao-Lei Yin; Xiao Yu; Tian Xue; Zhi-Gang Xu; Jin-Peng Sun
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  In vivo microinjection and electroporation of mouse testis.

Authors:  Marten Michaelis; Alexander Sobczak; Joachim M Weitzel
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  DSCAM promotes self-avoidance in the developing mouse retina by masking the functions of cadherin superfamily members.

Authors:  Andrew M Garrett; Andre Khalil; David O Walton; Robert W Burgess
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Multiple intrinsic factors act in concert with Lhx2 to direct retinal gliogenesis.

Authors:  Jimmy de Melo; Brian S Clark; Seth Blackshaw
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Tropisms of AAV for subretinal delivery to the neonatal mouse retina and its application for in vivo rescue of developmental photoreceptor disorders.

Authors:  Satoshi Watanabe; Rikako Sanuki; Shinji Ueno; Toshiyuki Koyasu; Toshiaki Hasegawa; Takahisa Furukawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Genetic Control of Rod Bipolar Cell Number in the Mouse Retina.

Authors:  Amanda G Kautzman; Patrick W Keeley; Sarra Borhanian; Caroline R Ackley; Benjamin E Reese
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Innovative Optogenetic Strategies for Vision Restoration.

Authors:  Cameron K Baker; John G Flannery
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 5.505

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.