Literature DB >> 21730943

Efficient gene delivery into multiple CNS territories using in utero electroporation.

Rajiv Dixit1, Fuqu Lu, Robert Cantrup, Nicole Gruenig, Lisa Marie Langevin, Deborah M Kurrasch, Carol Schuurmans.   

Abstract

The ability to manipulate gene expression is the cornerstone of modern day experimental embryology, leading to the elucidation of multiple developmental pathways. Several powerful and well established transgenic technologies are available to manipulate gene expression levels in mouse, allowing for the generation of both loss- and gain-of-function models. However, the generation of mouse transgenics is both costly and time consuming. Alternative methods of gene manipulation have therefore been widely sought. In utero electroporation is a method of gene delivery into live mouse embryos(1,2) that we have successfully adapted(3,4). It is largely based on the success of in ovo electroporation technologies that are commonly used in chick(5). Briefly, DNA is injected into the open ventricles of the developing brain and the application of an electrical current causes the formation of transient pores in cell membranes, allowing for the uptake of DNA into the cell. In our hands, embryos can be efficiently electroporated as early as embryonic day (E) 11.5, while the targeting of younger embryos would require an ultrasound-guided microinjection protocol, as previously described(6). Conversely, E15.5 is the latest stage we can easily electroporate, due to the onset of parietal and frontal bone differentiation, which hampers microinjection into the brain. In contrast, the retina is accessible through the end of embryogenesis. Embryos can be collected at any time point throughout the embryonic or early postnatal period. Injection of a reporter construct facilitates the identification of transfected cells. To date, in utero electroporation has been most widely used for the analysis of neocortical development(1,2,3,4). More recent studies have targeted the embryonic retina(7,8,9) and thalamus(10,11,12). Here, we present a modified in utero electroporation protocol that can be easily adapted to target different domains of the embryonic CNS. We provide evidence that by using this technique, we can target the embryonic telencephalon, diencephalon and retina. Representative results are presented, first showing the use of this technique to introduce DNA expression constructs into the lateral ventricles, allowing us to monitor progenitor maturation, differentiation and migration in the embryonic telencephalon. We also show that this technique can be used to target DNA to the diencephalic territories surrounding the 3(rd) ventricle, allowing the migratory routes of differentiating neurons into diencephalic nuclei to be monitored. Finally, we show that the use of micromanipulators allows us to accurately introduce DNA constructs into small target areas, including the subretinal space, allowing us to analyse the effects of manipulating gene expression on retinal development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21730943      PMCID: PMC3197065          DOI: 10.3791/2957

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  13 in total

1.  A method for rapid gain-of-function studies in the mouse embryonic nervous system.

Authors:  N Gaiano; J D Kohtz; D H Turnbull; G Fishell
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 2.  Gain- and loss-of-function in chick embryos by electroporation.

Authors:  Harukazu Nakamura; Tatsuya Katahira; Tatsuya Sato; Yuji Watanabe; Jun-Ichi Funahashi
Journal:  Mech Dev       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.882

3.  Validating in utero electroporation for the rapid analysis of gene regulatory elements in the murine telencephalon.

Authors:  Lisa Marie Langevin; Pierre Mattar; Raffaella Scardigli; Myriam Roussigné; Cairine Logan; Patrick Blader; Carol Schuurmans
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.780

4.  Expression pattern of the transcription factor Olig2 in response to brain injuries: implications for neuronal repair.

Authors:  Annalisa Buffo; Milan R Vosko; Dilek Ertürk; Gerhard F Hamann; Mathias Jucker; David Rowitch; Magdalena Götz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Sonic hedgehog signaling controls thalamic progenitor identity and nuclei specification in mice.

Authors:  Tou Yia Vue; Krista Bluske; Amin Alishahi; Lin Lin Yang; Naoko Koyano-Nakagawa; Bennett Novitch; Yasushi Nakagawa
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors cooperate to specify a cortical projection neuron identity.

Authors:  Pierre Mattar; Lisa Marie Langevin; Kathryn Markham; Natalia Klenin; Salma Shivji; Dawn Zinyk; Carol Schuurmans
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Electroporation and RNA interference in the rodent retina in vivo and in vitro.

Authors:  Takahiko Matsuda; Constance L Cepko
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Aberrant axonal projections from mammillary bodies in Pax6 mutant mice: possible roles of Netrin-1 and Slit 2 in mammillary projections.

Authors:  Reiko Tsuchiya; Kaoru Takahashi; Fu-Chin Liu; Hiroshi Takahashi
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 4.164

9.  In utero and ex vivo electroporation for gene expression in mouse retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Timothy J Petros; Alexandra Rebsam; Carol A Mason
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 1.355

10.  Gene delivery into mouse retinal ganglion cells by in utero electroporation.

Authors:  Cristina Garcia-Frigola; Maria Isabel Carreres; Celia Vegar; Eloisa Herrera
Journal:  BMC Dev Biol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 1.978

View more
  15 in total

1.  Targeted in vivo genetic manipulation of the mouse or rat brain by in utero electroporation with a triple-electrode probe.

Authors:  Joanna Szczurkowska; Andrzej W Cwetsch; Marco dal Maschio; Diego Ghezzi; Gian Michele Ratto; Laura Cancedda
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  Genetic manipulation of the mouse developing hypothalamus through in utero electroporation.

Authors:  Roberta Haddad-Tóvolli; Nora-Emöke Szabó; Xunlei Zhou; Gonzalo Alvarez-Bolado
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Induction of protein deletion through in utero electroporation to define deficits in neuronal migration in transgenic models.

Authors:  Devon S Svoboda; Alysen Clark; David S Park; Ruth S Slack
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Neurog2 and Ascl1 together regulate a postmitotic derepression circuit to govern laminar fate specification in the murine neocortex.

Authors:  Daniel J Dennis; Grey Wilkinson; Saiqun Li; Rajiv Dixit; Lata Adnani; Anjali Balakrishnan; Sisu Han; Christopher Kovach; Nicole Gruenig; Deborah M Kurrasch; Richard H Dyck; Carol Schuurmans
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Neurog1 and Neurog2 control two waves of neuronal differentiation in the piriform cortex.

Authors:  Rajiv Dixit; Grey Wilkinson; Gonzalo I Cancino; Tarek Shaker; Lata Adnani; Saiqun Li; Daniel Dennis; Deborah Kurrasch; Jennifer A Chan; Eric C Olson; David R Kaplan; Céline Zimmer; Carol Schuurmans
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Inducing Cre-lox Recombination in Mouse Cerebral Cortex Through In Utero Electroporation.

Authors:  Katherine M Bland; Zachary O Casey; Christopher J Handwerk; Z Logan Holley; George S Vidal
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  GSK3 temporally regulates neurogenin 2 proneural activity in the neocortex.

Authors:  Saiqun Li; Pierre Mattar; Dawn Zinyk; Kulwant Singh; Chandra-Prakash Chaturvedi; Christopher Kovach; Rajiv Dixit; Deborah M Kurrasch; Yong-Chao Ma; Jennifer A Chan; Valerie Wallace; F Jeffrey Dilworth; Marjorie Brand; Carol Schuurmans
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Pax6 regulates Tbr1 and Tbr2 expressions in olfactory bulb mitral cells.

Authors:  Fumiaki Imamura; Charles A Greer
Journal:  Mol Cell Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 4.314

9.  Gene delivery in mouse auditory brainstem and hindbrain using in utero electroporation.

Authors:  Laurence S David; Jamila Aitoubah; Lee Stephen Lesperance; Lu-Yang Wang
Journal:  Mol Brain       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 4.041

10.  Expansion of embryonic and adult neural stem cells by in utero electroporation or viral stereotaxic injection.

Authors:  Benedetta Artegiani; Christian Lange; Federico Calegari
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 1.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.