Literature DB >> 21730837

Laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy: a viable treatment option?

Seongmu Lee1, Michael T Yen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Improvements in endoscopic instrumentation and evolving laser technologies have renewed interest in laser-assisted endonasal applications, and an increasing number of lacrimal surgeons have focused on laser-assisted approaches to dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). The purpose of this review was to assess the clinical efficacy of laser-assisted DCR techniques with a particular focus on the endocanalicular approach and to describe various laser systems and their associated tissue effects. RECENT
FINDINGS: Recent studies of endocanalicular laser DCR suggest favorable success rates that are comparable with external and endonasal endoscopic DCR, although there is a shortage of robust, prospective, randomized studies.
SUMMARY: Recent evidence suggests that endocanalicular laser DCR is a well tolerated, viable treatment option for nasolacrimal duct obstruction in selected patients with favorable results and shorter operative times. More recent studies seem to suggest improvements in success rates compared with older studies, although additional, well designed, comparative studies are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21730837     DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e32834994c8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1040-8738            Impact factor:   3.761


  9 in total

Review 1.  Comprehensive review on endonasal endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Rainer K Weber; Werner Hosemann
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-22

2.  Naso-cutaneous fistula following transcanalicular laser dacrocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Ruchi Goel; Sonam Garg; Smriti Nagpal; Sushil Kumar; Saurabh Kamal
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11-28

Review 3.  Current concepts of ocular adnexal surgery.

Authors:  Maria Borrelli; Gerd Geerling
Journal:  GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW       Date:  2013-02-27

4.  Is transcanalicular laser dacryocystorhinostomy using low energy 810 nm diode laser better than 980 nm diode laser?

Authors:  Ruchi Goel; Smriti Nagpal; Sonam Garg; Krishan Pal Singh Malik
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015 May-Aug

5.  Results of nonendoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Passorn Preechawai
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-08-13

6.  A new approach to endoscopic DCR.

Authors:  Amit Pal Singh; Vineet Narula; Ravi Meher
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-10

7.  Analysis of age as a possible prognostic factor for transcanalicular multidiode laser dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Emre Ayintap; Ibrahim Bulent Buttanri; Fariz Sadıgov; Didem Serin; Mustafa Ozsutcu; Julide Canan Umurhan Akkan; Kemal Tuncer
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Comparison of Transcanalicular Multidiode Laser Dacryocystorhinostomy with and without Silicon Tube Intubation.

Authors:  Yildiray Yildirim; Taner Kar; Tuncay Topal; Enver Cesmeci; Abdullah Kaya; Kadir Colakoglu; Yakup Aksoy; Murat Sonmez
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 1.909

9.  Comparison of outcomes of conventional transcanalicular laser dacryocystorhinostomy and modified transcanalicular laser dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Senay Asik Nacaroglu; Sahin Ogreden; Ahu Yılmaz; Kursat Atalay; Ahmet Kırgız
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 1.195

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.