Literature DB >> 21729838

Optical coherence tomography at follow-up after percutaneous coronary intervention: relationship between procedural dissections, stent strut malapposition and stent healing.

Maria Radu1, Erik Jørgensen, Henning Kelbæk, Steffen Helqvist, Lene Skovgaard, Kari Saunamäki.   

Abstract

AIMS: To analyse the relationship between strut apposition as visualised with optical coherence tomography (OCT) at follow-up and clinical and procedural characteristics at stent implantation, and to examine the relationship between strut apposition and stent healing. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Twenty-eight coronary lesions were evaluated. The lesion morphology before stent implantation was described from the baseline angiogram. Strut apposition at follow-up was divided into: (I) apposed struts, (II) struts overlying side branch ostia, (III) malapposed and (IV) protruding struts. Since malapposed and protruding struts often occurred in the same lesions, these were divided into two groups: lesions without (n=20) and lesions with (n=8) the presence of these struts. The thickness of strut coverage was used as a surrogate for stent healing. We analysed 5,159 struts. Sixteen were malapposed and 216 were protruding. Lesions with malapposed and/or protruding struts at OCT follow-up were more frequently associated with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and procedure related dissections at stent implantation than lesions without. There was a tendency towards a less pronounced strut coverage over malapposed and protruding struts, as compared to apposed struts.
CONCLUSIONS: ACS and procedural dissections at stent implantation may be related to strut malapposition/protrusion at follow-up, which may influence the degree of strut coverage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21729838     DOI: 10.4244/EIJV7I3A60

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EuroIntervention        ISSN: 1774-024X            Impact factor:   6.534


  4 in total

1.  Vulnerable struts with CRE8, Biomatrix and Xience stents assessed with OCT and their correlation with clinical variables at 6-month follow-up: the CREBX-OCT study.

Authors:  Cristina Giglioli; Chiara Formentini; Salvatore Mario Romano; Emanuele Cecchi; Giorgio Jacopo Baldereschi; Daniele Landi; Marco Chiostri; Francesco Prati; Niccolò Marchionni
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Stent thrombosis: understanding and managing a critical problem.

Authors:  Julio F Marchini; Andre Manica; Kevin Croce
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2012-02

3.  Clinical significance of optical coherence tomography-guided angioplasty on treatment selection.

Authors:  Jianfeng Huang; Kamal Belmadani; Marion Chatot; Fiona Ecarnot; Romain Chopard; Manhong Wang; Xu Cai; Francois Schiele; Nicolas Meneveau
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound for culprit lesion assessment in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Blaz Mrevlje; Paweł Kleczyński; Igor Kranjec; Jacek Jąkała; Marko Noc; Łukasz Rzeszutko; Artur Dziewierz; Marcin Wizimirski; Dariusz Dudek; Jacek Legutko
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 1.426

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.