Literature DB >> 21729723

Gender differences and the relationships of perceived background stress and psychological distress with cardiovascular responses to laboratory stressors.

Michael T Allen1, Christine M Bocek, Ashley E Burch.   

Abstract

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the relationships of perceived background stress and self-reported psychological distress on cardiovascular reactivity during acute laboratory stressors. The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) was used as the measure of perceived background stress, and the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) was used as the measure of psychological distress. A secondary aim was to examine whether background stress and psychological distress affected the susceptibility to induction of a negative mood using music. Heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) were measured in 149 female and male college students at rest and during a stressful mental arithmetic (MA) task and a mood induction procedure. Higher scores on the GHQ were associated with lower systolic BP reactivity during the MA task by all participants. Higher scores on the PSS and GHQ were also associated with lower diastolic BP and HR reactivity, but only in females. Thus, higher self-reports of background stress and psychological distress tended to result in blunted reactivity to an acute laboratory challenge. Higher levels of background stress and psychological distress were not associated with greater susceptibility to a negative mood induction. This study adds to the growing literature indicating that potentially negative health outcomes may be associated with diminished cardiovascular reactivity under certain conditions.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21729723     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  8 in total

1.  Impact of psychological distress on cardiovagal reactivation after a speech task.

Authors:  A P Koutnik; M A Sanchez-Gonzalez; R W May; R M Hughes; F D Fincham
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.012

2.  History of childhood adversity is positively associated with ventral striatal dopamine responses to amphetamine.

Authors:  Lynn M Oswald; Gary S Wand; Hiroto Kuwabara; Dean F Wong; Shijun Zhu; James R Brasic
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Preliminary evidence of attenuated blood pressure reactivity to acute stress in adults following a recent marital separation.

Authors:  Austin M Grinberg; Karey L O'Hara; David A Sbarra
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2017-09-07

4.  Regular cannabis use is associated with blunted affective, but not cardiovascular, stress responses.

Authors:  Briana N DeAngelis; Mustafa al'Absi
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 4.591

5.  History of Preeclampsia Adds to the Deleterious Effect of Chronic Stress on the Cardiac Ability to Flexibly Adapt to Challenge.

Authors:  Helmut K Lackner; Manfred G Moertl; Karin Schmid-Zalaudek; Miha Lucovnik; Elisabeth M Weiss; Vassiliki Kolovetsiou-Kreiner; Ilona Papousek
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Displacement behaviour is associated with reduced stress levels among men but not women.

Authors:  Changiz Mohiyeddini; Stephanie Bauer; Stuart Semple
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effect of fast and slow pranayama on perceived stress and cardiovascular parameters in young health-care students.

Authors:  Vivek Kumar Sharma; Madanmohan Trakroo; Velkumary Subramaniam; M Rajajeyakumar; Anand B Bhavanani; Ajit Sahai
Journal:  Int J Yoga       Date:  2013-07

8.  Ginseng and Ginkgo Biloba Effects on Cognition as Modulated by Cardiovascular Reactivity: A Randomised Trial.

Authors:  Derek Ong Lai Teik; Xiao Shiang Lee; Chu Jian Lim; Chia Mei Low; Mariyam Muslima; Luca Aquili
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.