Literature DB >> 21729659

Nipple discharge after nipple-sparing mastectomy: should the areola complex always be removed?

Lorenzo Orzalesi1, Silvia Aldrovandi, Claudio Calabrese, Donato Casella, Beniamino Brancato, Luigi Cataliotti.   

Abstract

Nipple discharge (ND) is a common symptom with a reported incidence of 2% to 5% of patients referred to breast cancer clinics. Approximately 90% of ND is of benign etiology. An underlying carcinoma is present with a rate of 6% to 21%. This is more frequent if it is associated with clinical or radiologic abnormality. ND after nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is a rare event as the whole retroareolar glandular tissue is usually completely removed with mastectomy. ND is otherwise possible if a small amount of tissue is accidentally left by the surgeon or with the aim of reducing the risk of the nipple-areola complex (NAC) necrosis. This condition can be of concern as it may imply a local recurrence and therefore implicate NAC removal. Herein we report a case of a ND in an NSM in which only a selective duct excision allowed NAC preservation.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21729659     DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2011.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1526-8209            Impact factor:   3.225


  1 in total

1.  Persistent nipple discharge after nipple-sparing mastectomy secondary to unincorporated AlloDerm: a case report.

Authors:  Avra S Laarakker; Audrey Rich; Jeffrey Wu; Stephanie Fine
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2020-09-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.