OBJECTIVE: To investigate the intakes of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB), fruit and vegetables (FV) among adolescents and their parents and to explore differences in the perceived availability by gender and parental education. DESIGN: Baseline data from the HEIA (HEalth In Adolescents) study. SETTING: Data on intake of SSB were collected assessing frequency and amounts, whereas consumption of FV was assessed on the basis of frequency. Further, perceived availability at home and at school (taken from home) was reported. SUBJECTS: Participants were 1528 Norwegian adolescents aged 11 years, as well as 1200 mothers and 1057 fathers. RESULTS: The adolescents' intake of SSB was low on weekdays but doubled during weekend days. This pattern was observed among parents as well. There were significant differences in intake between boys, girls, mothers and fathers, except for vegetables. Fathers reported the lowest frequency of FV intake. Compared with adolescents, mothers reported lower availability of SSB and higher availability of FV. Compared with their sons, fathers reported higher availability of vegetables and lower availability of sugar-sweetened fruit drinks at school. Significant differences in adolescents' intake of SSB and in the perceived availability of both SSB and FV by parental education were found. CONCLUSIONS: The intake of SSB was higher during weekend days than during weekdays, whereas the frequency of FV intake was low. Differences in adolescents' perceived availability of both SSB and FV on the basis of parental education were found, whereas the differences in intake were significant only for SSB. Increasing parental awareness of availability and their potential as role models across parental gender and educational level could improve adolescents' dietary habits.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the intakes of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB), fruit and vegetables (FV) among adolescents and their parents and to explore differences in the perceived availability by gender and parental education. DESIGN: Baseline data from the HEIA (HEalth In Adolescents) study. SETTING: Data on intake of SSB were collected assessing frequency and amounts, whereas consumption of FV was assessed on the basis of frequency. Further, perceived availability at home and at school (taken from home) was reported. SUBJECTS:Participants were 1528 Norwegian adolescents aged 11 years, as well as 1200 mothers and 1057 fathers. RESULTS: The adolescents' intake of SSB was low on weekdays but doubled during weekend days. This pattern was observed among parents as well. There were significant differences in intake between boys, girls, mothers and fathers, except for vegetables. Fathers reported the lowest frequency of FV intake. Compared with adolescents, mothers reported lower availability of SSB and higher availability of FV. Compared with their sons, fathers reported higher availability of vegetables and lower availability of sugar-sweetened fruit drinks at school. Significant differences in adolescents' intake of SSB and in the perceived availability of both SSB and FV by parental education were found. CONCLUSIONS: The intake of SSB was higher during weekend days than during weekdays, whereas the frequency of FV intake was low. Differences in adolescents' perceived availability of both SSB and FV on the basis of parental education were found, whereas the differences in intake were significant only for SSB. Increasing parental awareness of availability and their potential as role models across parental gender and educational level could improve adolescents' dietary habits.
Authors: Laura M Bogart; Marc N Elliott; Allison J Ober; David J Klein; Jennifer Hawes-Dawson; Burton O Cowgill; Kimberly Uyeda; Mark A Schuster Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2017-01-29 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: M I Mesana; A Hilbig; O Androutsos; M Cuenca-García; J Dallongeville; I Huybrechts; S De Henauw; K Widhalm; A Kafatos; E Nova; A Marcos; M González-Gross; D Molnar; F Gottrand; L A Moreno Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2016-11-29 Impact factor: 5.614
Authors: Rikke Krølner; Thea Suldrup Jørgensen; Anne Kristine Aarestrup; Anne Hjøllund Christiansen; Anne Maj Christensen; Pernille Due Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-03-14 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Jonas D Finger; Gianni Varnaccia; Thorkild Tylleskär; Thomas Lampert; Gert B M Mensink Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-05-19 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Mona Bjelland; Solveig E S Hausken; Ingunn H Bergh; May Grydeland; Knut-Inge Klepp; Lene F Andersen; Torunn H Totland; Nanna Lien Journal: Food Nutr Res Date: 2015-03-20 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Mona Bjelland; Solveig E S Hausken; Ester F C Sleddens; Lene F Andersen; Hanne C Lie; Arnstein Finset; Lea Maes; Elisabeth L Melbye; Kari Glavin; Merete W Hanssen-Bauer; Nanna Lien Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2014-10-15 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Cornelia E Rebholz; Mai J M Chinapaw; Maartje M van Stralen; Elling Bere; Bettina Bringolf; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij; Nataša Jan; Eva Kovacs; Lea Maes; Yannis Manios; Luis Moreno; Amika S Singh; Johannes Brug; Saskia J te Velde Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-09-05 Impact factor: 3.295