Literature DB >> 21728937

Prevalence and characteristics of complaint-prone doctors in private practice in Victoria.

Marie M Bismark1, Matthew J Spittal, David M Studdert.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify characteristics of doctors who are repeated subjects of complaints by patients. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Case-control study of doctors about whom patients had complained to the Victorian Health Services Commissioner between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2009. PARTICIPANTS: 384 doctors in private practice; cases comprised 96 doctors who were the subject of four or more separate complaints; and the control group comprised 288 doctors who were the subject of a single complaint over the study period.
RESULTS: Among doctors in private practice in Victoria, 20.5% (95% CI, 19.7%-21.3%) experienced at least one complaint over the decade. Among doctors who were the subject of a complaint, 4.5% (95% CI, 3.6%-5.4%) had four or more complaints, and this group accounted for 17.6% (95% CI, 16.3%-19.0%) of all complaints to the Victorian Health Services Commissioner. Multivariate analyses showed that surgeons (odds ratio [OR], 8.90; 95% CI, 3.69-21.50) and psychiatrists (OR, 4.59; 95% CI, 1.46-14.43) had higher odds of being in the complaint-prone group than general practitioners. Doctors trained overseas had lower odds of being complaint-prone than those trained in Australia (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.13-0.72).
CONCLUSIONS: A small group of doctors in private practice in Victoria account for nearly 18% of complaints. Interventions to improve patient satisfaction and public confidence in health services should target complaint-prone subgroups of practitioners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21728937     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb03183.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  5 in total

1.  The PRONE score: an algorithm for predicting doctors' risks of formal patient complaints using routinely collected administrative data.

Authors:  Matthew J Spittal; Marie M Bismark; David M Studdert
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 7.035

2.  Fitness-to-practice concerns in rural undergraduate medical education: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Pamela Claire Snow; Pamela Jane Harvey; Kylie Lynette Cocking
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Outcomes of notifications to health practitioner boards: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Matthew J Spittal; David M Studdert; Ron Paterson; Marie M Bismark
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 8.775

4.  Qualitative evaluation of an educational intervention to reduce medicolegal risks for medical doctors experiencing significantly more cases than their peers in the UK and Ireland.

Authors:  John Jolly; Paul Bowie; Julie Price; Matt Mason; Mark Dinwoodie
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Identification of doctors at risk of recurrent complaints: a national study of healthcare complaints in Australia.

Authors:  Marie M Bismark; Matthew J Spittal; Lyle C Gurrin; Michael Ward; David M Studdert
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 7.035

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.