Literature DB >> 21728450

Affective mediators of intergroup contact: a three-wave longitudinal study in South Africa.

Hermann Swart1, Miles Hewstone, Oliver Christ, Alberto Voci.   

Abstract

Intergroup contact (especially cross-group friendship) is firmly established as a powerful strategy for combating group-based prejudice (Pettigrew & Tropp, 2006). Great advances have been made in understanding how contact reduces prejudice (Brown & Hewstone, 2005), highlighting the importance of affective mediators (Pettigrew & Tropp, 2008). The present study, a 3-wave longitudinal study undertaken among minority-status Colored high school children in South Africa (N = 465), explored the full mediation of the effects of cross-group friendships on positive outgroup attitudes, perceived outgroup variability, and negative action tendencies via positive (affective empathy) and negative (intergroup anxiety) affective mediators simultaneously. The target group was the majority-status White South African outgroup. As predicted, a bidirectional model described the relationship between contact, mediators, and prejudice significantly better over time than either autoregressive or unidirectional longitudinal models. However, full longitudinal mediation was only found in the direction from Time 1 contact to Time 3 prejudice (via Time 2 mediators), supporting the underlying tenet of the contact hypothesis. Specifically, cross-group friendships were positively associated with positive outgroup attitudes (via affective empathy) and perceived outgroup variability (via intergroup anxiety and affective empathy) and were negatively associated with negative action tendencies (via affective empathy). Following Pettigrew and Tropp (2008), we compared two alternative hypotheses regarding the relationship between intergroup anxiety and affective empathy over time. Time 1 intergroup anxiety was indirectly negatively associated with Time 3 affective empathy, via Time 2 cross-group friendships. We discuss the theoretical and empirical contributions of this study and make suggestions for future research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21728450     DOI: 10.1037/a0024450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  20 in total

1.  When and How Do Students Benefit From Ethnic Diversity in Middle School?

Authors:  Jaana Juvonen; Kara Kogachi; Sandra Graham
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2017-06-20

2.  Friendships fighting prejudice: a longitudinal perspective on adolescents' cross-group friendships with immigrants.

Authors:  Peter F Titzmann; Alaina Brenick; Rainer K Silbereisen
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2015-02-03

3.  Predicting the Intention to Use Condoms and Actual Condom Use Behaviour: A Three-Wave Longitudinal Study in Ghana.

Authors:  Enoch Teye-Kwadjo; Ashraf Kagee; Hermann Swart
Journal:  Appl Psychol Health Well Being       Date:  2016-12-07

4.  A little similarity goes a long way: the effects of peripheral but self-revealing similarities on improving and sustaining interracial relationships.

Authors:  Tessa V West; Joe C Magee; Sarah H Gordon; Lindy Gullett
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2014-07

5.  (Bad) Feelings about Meeting Them? Episodic and Chronic Intergroup Emotions Associated with Positive and Negative Intergroup Contact As Predictors of Intergroup Behavior.

Authors:  Mathias Kauff; Frank Asbrock; Ulrich Wagner; Thomas F Pettigrew; Miles Hewstone; Sarina J Schäfer; Oliver Christ
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-29

6.  The Diversity Paradox: Opportunities and Challenges of "Contact in Context" across Development.

Authors:  Tiffany Yip; Yuen Mi Cheon; Yijie Wang
Journal:  Res Hum Dev       Date:  2019-03-18

7.  Testing the Shielding Effect of Intergenerational Contact against Ageism in the Workplace: A Canadian Study.

Authors:  Martine Lagacé; Anna Rosa Donizzetti; Lise Van de Beeck; Caroline D Bergeron; Philippe Rodrigues-Rouleau; Audrey St-Amour
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  How can intergroup interaction be bad if intergroup contact is good? Exploring and reconciling an apparent paradox in the science of intergroup relations.

Authors:  Cara C MacInnis; Elizabeth Page-Gould
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-05

9.  Intergroup Contact Effects via Ingroup Distancing among Majority and Minority Groups: Moderation by Social Dominance Orientation.

Authors:  Mathias Kauff; Katharina Schmid; Simon Lolliot; Ananthi Al Ramiah; Miles Hewstone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The wallpaper effect: the contact hypothesis fails for minority group members who live in areas with a high proportion of majority group members.

Authors:  Fiona Kate Barlow; Matthew J Hornsey; Michael Thai; Nikhil K Sengupta; Chris G Sibley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.