Literature DB >> 21727175

Comparison of the use of minimized cardiopulmonary bypass with conventional techniques on the incidence of retinal microemboli during aortic valve replacement surgery.

R Rimpiläinen1, N Hautala, Jk Koskenkari, J Rimpiläinen, Pp Ohtonen, P Mustonen, H-M Surcel, E-R Savolainen, M Mosorin, Ti Ala-Kokko, T Juvonen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Minimized cardiopulmonary bypass (MCPB) circuits have been shown to reduce cerebral and retinal microembolisation during coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery compared to conventional CPB (CCPB) circuits. Our aim was to evaluate whether the reduction of microembolisation is sustained in aortic valve surgery, as well as to evaluate the effects of MCPB on inflammatory, endothelial, and platelet activation markers.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to undergo aortic valve replacement (AVR), with or without CABG, with MPCB (n=20) or CCPB (n=20). After anaesthesia induction and termination of CPB, standardized digital retinal fluorescein angiography images were obtained on both eyes and analyzed in a blinded fashion. Blood samples were collected at eight time points until the third postoperative day.
RESULTS: Fewer patients in the MCPB group showed evidence of microembolic perfusion defects on postperfusion retinal fluorescein angiographs compared to the CCPB group (37% vs. 63%, absolute difference 26%, 95% CI -5% -51%, P = 0.194). Polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN) elastase and von Willebrand factor release were statistically significantly reduced in the MCPB group, but there were no significant differences in other markers of inflammation, coagulation or endothelial activation. A significantly higher three-fold increase in the amount of shed blood was collected to the cell saver with a higher rate of intraoperative platelet transfusion in the MCPB group compared to CCPB.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of MCPB was associated statistically insignificantly with less retinal microemboli compared to CCPB. MCPB was complicated by excess bleeding and need for transfusion. The feasibility of MCPB techniques in valve surgery requires further studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21727175     DOI: 10.1177/0267659111415564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perfusion        ISSN: 0267-6591            Impact factor:   1.972


  4 in total

Review 1.  Perioperative Visual Loss in Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Jacob Raphael; Heather E Moss; Steven Roth
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2018-11-24       Impact factor: 2.628

2.  Retinal arterial blood flow and retinal changes in patients with sepsis: preliminary study using fluorescein angiography.

Authors:  Kristo Erikson; Janne Henrik Liisanantti; Nina Hautala; Juha Koskenkari; Remi Kamakura; Karl Heinz Herzig; Hannu Syrjälä; Tero Ilmari Ala-Kokko
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 9.097

3.  Conventional versus miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Timothy Cheng; Rajas Barve; Yeu Wah Michael Cheng; Andrew Ravendren; Amna Ahmed; Steven Toh; Christopher J Goulden; Amer Harky
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2021-10-01

4.  Assessment of Retinal Capillary Dropout after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.

Authors:  Jeanne Martine Gunzinger; Burbuqe Ibrahimi; Joel Baur; Maximilian Robert Justus Wiest; Marco Piccirelli; Athina Pangalu; Dominik Straumann; Fabian Nietlispach; Igal Moarof; Sandrine Anne Zweifel
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.