Literature DB >> 21727151

Usefulness of the 6-minute walk test and the 200-metre fast walk test to individualize high intensity interval and continuous exercise training in coronary artery disease patients after acute coronary syndrome: a pilot controlled clinical study.

M Gremeaux1, A Hannequin, Y Laurent, D Laroche, J M Casillas, V Gremeaux.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of three individualized exercise training prescriptions using either a percentage of maximal heart rate (HR), maximal 6-minute walk test (6MWT) HR, or maximal 200-metre fast walk test (200-mFWT) HR, on walking performance and exercise capacity in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients.
DESIGN: Controlled clinical study. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-seven outpatients enrolled in a rehabilitation programme after an acute coronary syndrome.
SETTING: Cardiac rehabilitation unit.
INTERVENTIONS: Three groups: (A): moderate intensity continuous exercise (MICE) at 70% of the maximal HR of the graded maximal exercise test (n = 10); (B): MICE at the maximal 6MWT HR (n = 8); (C): high intensity interval training (HIIT) based on the 6MWT and the 200-mFWT maximal HR (n = 9). Group B and C performed walk tests every 2 weeks, to readjust training HR (THR) if needed. MEASURES: 6MWT and 200-mFWT performances, peak VO(2) and peak power (Pmax).
RESULTS: 6MWT and 200-mFWT performances improved significantly and similarly in all groups (P < 0.05). Peak VO(2) improved significantly in all groups (P < 0.05), this improvement being higher in group C (HIIT) versus A (P < 0.05). Group B was closer to the recommended THR during exercise sessions compared to group A.
CONCLUSION: This pilot study showed that using the 6MWT and 200-mFWT HR to individualize MICE or HIIT prescription is feasible in CAD patients, and could lead them closer to THR objective, to similar improvements in walking performance, and greater peak VO(2) increase for HIIT. Future randomised studies should investigate long-term effects of programmes prescribed from walk tests HR, especially for HIIT modality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21727151     DOI: 10.1177/0269215511403942

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rehabil        ISSN: 0269-2155            Impact factor:   3.477


  4 in total

Review 1.  Aerobic Interval vs. Continuous Training in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease or Heart Failure: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with a Focus on Secondary Outcomes.

Authors:  Nele Pattyn; Randy Beulque; Véronique Cornelissen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Effects of Endurance Training on Motor Signs of Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Filipe Oliveira de Almeida; Vagner Santana; Daniel M Corcos; Carlos Ugrinowitsch; Carla Silva-Batista
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 11.928

3.  Relationships between heart rate target determined in different exercise testing in COPD patients to prescribed with individualized exercise training.

Authors:  Claudine Fabre; Baptiste Chehere; Frédéric Bart; Patrick Mucci; Benoit Wallaert; Jean Marie Grosbois
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2017-05-16

4.  Effects of high-intensity and moderate-intensity exercise training on cardiopulmonary function in patients with coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liying Zheng; Deng Pan; Yimeng Gu; Rumeng Wang; Yanyan Wu; Mei Xue
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.