Literature DB >> 21726975

Validation of the new AJCC TNM staging system for gastric cancer in a large cohort of patients (n = 2,155): focus on the T category.

A Marchet1, S Mocellin, A Ambrosi, P Morgagni, G Vittimberga, F Roviello, D Marrelli, G de Manzoni, A Minicozzi, A Coniglio, G Tiberio, F Pacelli, F Rosa, D Nitti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of T subclassification in patients with gastric carcinoma has been just implemented in the new AJCC TNM staging system, which has reclassified T2a and T2b into T2 and T3 tumors, respectively. The aim of the present study was to validate the prognostic significance of the new T categorization within the frame of the latest TNM staging system.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 686 T2/T3 patients among 2155 subjects who underwent radical resection for gastric carcinoma at six Italian centers from 1988 through 2006.
RESULTS: Upon multivariate analysis, the new T categories, extent of lymph node dissection (D) and patient's age were retained by the survival model as independent prognostic factors. In particular, the death risk for patients with T3 tumors was higher than that of patients with T2 tumors (HR: 1.42, P = 0.005). Among the 686 patients previously classified as having T2 tumors, patients with T2 and T3 disease were 270 (39.4%) and 416 (60.6%), respectively. After a median follow-up of 55 months, the 5-year overall survival rates were 67.3% and 52.3% for patients with T2 and T3 tumors, respectively (P < 0.001). The survival advantage for the T2 as compared to T3 category was maintained even when N0 and N+ patients were separately considered (P = 0.0154 and P < 0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm the prognostic difference between the newly proposed T2 and T3 categories, which should be implemented in the routine clinical practice to improve risk stratification of patients with gastric cancer.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21726975     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  11 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of the seventh AJCC TNM staging system for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Authors:  Jizhun Zhang; Yangbing Zhou; Kewei Jiang; Zhanlong Shen; Yingjiang Ye; Shan Wang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-04-03

2.  Sixth and seventh tumor-node-metastasis staging system compared in gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Tommaso Zurleni; Elson Gjoni; Andrea Ballabio; Roberto Casieri; Paola Ceriani; Luca Marzoli; Francesco Zurleni
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-11-27

3.  Overexpression of DEK is an indicator of poor prognosis in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yingfu Ou; Rongjun Xia; Fanyong Kong; Xiaokang Zhang; Shengjin Yu; Lili Jiang; Linlin Zheng; Lijuan Lin
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  The New American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer staging system for adenocarcinoma of the stomach: increased complexity without clear improvement in predictive accuracy.

Authors:  Johan L Dikken; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Mithat Gönen; Marcel Verheij; Murray F Brennan; Daniel G Coit
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Impact on survival of the number of lymph nodes resected in patients with lymph node-negative gastric cancer.

Authors:  Xiaoyuan Chu; Zhong-Fa Yang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 2.754

6.  Comparison of different lymph node staging systems in prognosis of gastric cancer: a bi-institutional study from Hungary.

Authors:  Dezső Tóth; Adrienn Bíró; Zsolt Varga; Miklós Török; Péter Árkosy
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.087

7.  Improvement of T stage precision by integration of surgical and pathological staging in radically resected stage pT3-pT4b gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hong-Hu Wang; Kai Li; Hao Xu; Zhe Sun; Zhen-Ning Wang; Hui-Mian Xu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-11

8.  Apparent diffusion coefficient by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a sole biomarker for staging and prognosis of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Francesco Giganti; Alessandro Ambrosi; Damiano Chiari; Elena Orsenigo; Antonio Esposito; Elena Mazza; Luca Albarello; Carlo Staudacher; Alessandro Del Maschio; Francesco De Cobelli
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 5.087

9.  Prognostic impact of Ki-67 in patients with gastric cancer-the importance of depth of invasion and histologic differentiation.

Authors:  Gyung Hyuck Ko; Se-Il Go; Won Sup Lee; Jeong-Hee Lee; Sang-Ho Jeong; Young-Joon Lee; Soon Chan Hong; Woo Song Ha
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Natural History of Early Gastric Cancer: a Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Tomohiro Iwai; Masao Yoshida; Hiroyuki Ono; Naomi Kakushima; Kohei Takizawa; Masaki Tanaka; Noboru Kawata; Sayo Ito; Kenichiro Imai; Kinichi Hotta; Hirotoshi Ishiwatari; Hiroyuki Matsubayashi
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 3.720

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.