Literature DB >> 21726192

Receptor-based pharmacophore and pharmacophore key descriptors for virtual screening and QSAR modeling.

Xialan Dong1, Jerry O Ebalunode, Sheng-Yong Yang, Weifan Zheng.   

Abstract

The intuitive nature of the pharmacophore concept has made it widely accepted by the medicinal chemistry community, evidenced by the past 3 decades of development and application of computerized pharmacophore modeling tools. On the other hand, shape complementarity has been recognized as a critical factor in molecular recognition between drugs and their receptors. Recent development of fast and accurate shape comparison tools has facilitated the wide spread use of shape matching technologies in drug discovery. However, pharmacophore and shape technologies, if used separately, often lead to high false positive rate. Thus, integrating pharmacophore matching and shape matching technologies into one program has the potential to reduce the false positive rates in virtual screening. Other issues of current pharmacophore technologies include sometimes high false negative rate and non-quantitative prediction. In this article, we first focus on a recently implemented method (Shape4) that combines receptor based shape matching and pharmacophore comparison in a single algorithm to create shape pharmacophore models for virtual screening. We also examine a recent example that utilizes multi-complex information to develop receptor-based pharmacophore models that promises to reduce false negative rate. Finally, we review several methods that employ receptor-based pharmacophore map and pharmacophore key descriptors for QSAR modeling. We conclude by emphasizing the concept of receptor-based shape pharmacophore and its roles in future drug discovery.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21726192     DOI: 10.2174/157340911796504332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Comput Aided Drug Des        ISSN: 1573-4099            Impact factor:   1.606


  5 in total

Review 1.  Development of small molecule non-peptide formyl peptide receptor (FPR) ligands and molecular modeling of their recognition.

Authors:  I A Schepetkin; A I Khlebnikov; M P Giovannoni; L N Kirpotina; A Cilibrizzi; M T Quinn
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  In silico design of anti-atherogenic biomaterials.

Authors:  Daniel R Lewis; Vladyslav Kholodovych; Michael D Tomasini; Dalia Abdelhamid; Latrisha K Petersen; William J Welsh; Kathryn E Uhrich; Prabhas V Moghe
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Predicting binding poses and affinity ranking in D3R Grand Challenge using PL-PatchSurfer2.0.

Authors:  Woong-Hee Shin; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Modular organization of α-toxins from scorpion venom mirrors domain structure of their targets, sodium channels.

Authors:  Anton O Chugunov; Anna D Koromyslova; Antonina A Berkut; Steve Peigneur; Jan Tytgat; Anton A Polyansky; Vladimir M Pentkovsky; Alexander A Vassilevski; Eugene V Grishin; Roman G Efremov
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Current computational methods for predicting protein interactions of natural products.

Authors:  Aurélien F A Moumbock; Jianyu Li; Pankaj Mishra; Mingjie Gao; Stefan Günther
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 7.271

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.