OBJECTIVE: Sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation consists of active compression-decompression, an impedance threshold device, abdominal binding, and large intravenous doses of sodium nitroprusside. We hypothesize that sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation will significantly increase carotid blood flow and return of spontaneous circulation compared to standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation after prolonged ventricular fibrillation and pulseless electrical activity cardiac arrest. DESIGN: Prospective randomized animal study. SETTING: Hennepin County Medical Center Animal Laboratory. SUBJECTS: Forty Yorkshire female farm-bred pigs weighing 32 ± 2 kg. INTERVENTIONS: In protocol A, 24 isoflurane-anesthetized pigs underwent 15 mins of untreated ventricular fibrillation and were subsequently randomized to receive standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation (n = 6), active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation + impedance threshold device (n = 6), or sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation (n = 12) for up to 15 mins. First defibrillation was attempted at minute 6 of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. In protocol B, a separate group of 16 pigs underwent 10 mins of untreated ventricular fibrillation followed by 3 mins of chest compression only cardiopulmonary resuscitation followed by countershock-induced pulseless electrical activity, after which animals were randomized to standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation (n = 8) or sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation (n = 8). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary end point was carotid blood flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and return of spontaneous circulation. Secondary end points included end-tidal CO2 as well as coronary and cerebral perfusion pressure. After prolonged untreated ventricular fibrillation, sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation demonstrated superior rates of return of spontaneous circulation when compared to standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation and active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation + impedance threshold device (12 of 12, 0 of 6, and 0 of 6 respectively, p < .01). In animals with pulseless electrical activity, sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation increased return of spontaneous circulation rates when compared to standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation. In both groups, carotid blood flow, coronary perfusion pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, and end-tidal CO2 were increased with sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation. CONCLUSIONS: In pigs, sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation significantly increased return of spontaneous circulation rates, as well as carotid blood flow and end-tidal CO2, when compared to standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation or active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation + impedance threshold device.
OBJECTIVE:Sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation consists of active compression-decompression, an impedance threshold device, abdominal binding, and large intravenous doses of sodium nitroprusside. We hypothesize that sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation will significantly increase carotid blood flow and return of spontaneous circulation compared to standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation after prolonged ventricular fibrillation and pulseless electrical activity cardiac arrest. DESIGN: Prospective randomized animal study. SETTING: Hennepin County Medical Center Animal Laboratory. SUBJECTS: Forty Yorkshire female farm-bred pigs weighing 32 ± 2 kg. INTERVENTIONS: In protocol A, 24 isoflurane-anesthetized pigs underwent 15 mins of untreated ventricular fibrillation and were subsequently randomized to receive standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation (n = 6), active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation + impedance threshold device (n = 6), or sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation (n = 12) for up to 15 mins. First defibrillation was attempted at minute 6 of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. In protocol B, a separate group of 16 pigs underwent 10 mins of untreated ventricular fibrillation followed by 3 mins of chest compression only cardiopulmonary resuscitation followed by countershock-induced pulseless electrical activity, after which animals were randomized to standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation (n = 8) or sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation (n = 8). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary end point was carotid blood flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and return of spontaneous circulation. Secondary end points included end-tidal CO2 as well as coronary and cerebral perfusion pressure. After prolonged untreated ventricular fibrillation, sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation demonstrated superior rates of return of spontaneous circulation when compared to standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation and active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation + impedance threshold device (12 of 12, 0 of 6, and 0 of 6 respectively, p < .01). In animals with pulseless electrical activity, sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation increased return of spontaneous circulation rates when compared to standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation. In both groups, carotid blood flow, coronary perfusion pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, and end-tidal CO2 were increased with sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation. CONCLUSIONS: In pigs, sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation significantly increased return of spontaneous circulation rates, as well as carotid blood flow and end-tidal CO2, when compared to standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation or active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation + impedance threshold device.
Authors: Michael R Sayre; Rudolph W Koster; Martin Botha; Diana M Cave; Michael T Cudnik; Anthony J Handley; Tetsuo Hatanaka; Mary Fran Hazinski; Ian Jacobs; Koen Monsieurs; Peter T Morley; Jerry P Nolan; Andrew H Travers Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-10-19 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Robert W Neumar; Charles W Otto; Mark S Link; Steven L Kronick; Michael Shuster; Clifton W Callaway; Peter J Kudenchuk; Joseph P Ornato; Bryan McNally; Scott M Silvers; Rod S Passman; Roger D White; Erik P Hess; Wanchun Tang; Daniel Davis; Elizabeth Sinz; Laurie J Morrison Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-11-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Sandra Högler; Fritz Sterz; Wolfgang Sipos; Alexandra Schratter; Wolfgang Weihs; Michael Holzer; Andreas Janata; Udo Losert; Wilhelm Behringer; Alexander Tichy; Peter Schmidt Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2010-08-19 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Tom P Aufderheide; Ralph J Frascone; Marvin A Wayne; Brian D Mahoney; Robert A Swor; Robert M Domeier; Michael L Olinger; Richard G Holcomb; David E Tupper; Demetris Yannopoulos; Keith G Lurie Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-01-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Kada Klouche; Max Harry Weil; Shijie Sun; Wanchun Tang; Heitor P Povoas; Takashi Kamohara; Joe Bisera Journal: Chest Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Demetris Yannopoulos; Timothy Matsuura; Scott McKnite; Noah Goodman; Ahamed Idris; Wanchun Tang; Tom P Aufderheide; Keith G Lurie Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Benno B Wolcke; Dietmar K Mauer; Mark F Schoefmann; Heinke Teichmann; Terry A Provo; Karl H Lindner; Wolfgang F Dick; Dorothee Aeppli; Keith G Lurie Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-10-20 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Robert A Berg; Ronald W Hilwig; Marc D Berg; David D Berg; Ricardo A Samson; Julia H Indik; Karl B Kern Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2008-05-14 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Demetris Yannopoulos; Nicolas Segal; Scott McKnite; Tom P Aufderheide; Keith G Lurie Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Jason Schultz; Nicolas Segal; James Kolbeck; Emily Caldwell; Marit Thorsgard; Scott McKnite; Tom P Aufderheide; Keith G Lurie; Demetris Yannopoulos Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Demetris Yannopoulos; Jason A Bartos; Stephen A George; George Sideris; Sebastian Voicu; Brett Oestreich; Timothy Matsuura; Kadambari Shekar; Jennifer Rees; Tom P Aufderheide Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2016-10-19 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Guillaume Debaty; Timothy R Matsuura; Jason A Bartos; Jennifer N Rees; Scott H McKnite; Michael Lick; François Boucher; Demetris Yannopoulos Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Adrian Ripeckyj; Marinos Kosmopoulos; Kadambari Shekar; Claire Carlson; Rajat Kalra; Jennifer Rees; Tom P Aufderheide; Jason A Bartos; Demetris Yannopoulos Journal: JACC Basic Transl Sci Date: 2020-02-05
Authors: Christian Crouzet; Robert H Wilson; Donald Lee; Afsheen Bazrafkan; Bruce J Tromberg; Yama Akbari; Bernard Choi Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2020-01-04 Impact factor: 5.501