Literature DB >> 21724682

No gender differences in prognosis and preventive treatment in patients with AMI without significant stenoses.

Kim Wadt Hansen1, Anders Hvelplund, Steen Zabell Abildstrøm, Eva Prescott, Mette Madsen, Jan Kyst Madsen, Jan Skov Jensen, Leif Thuesen, Per Thayssen, Hans Henrik Tilsted, Erik Jørgensen, Søren Galatius.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate possible gender differences in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and without significant stenoses on coronary angiography (CAG) regarding prognosis and use of secondary preventive medication.
DESIGN: Nationwide register-based cohort study. PATIENTS: By compiling data from Danish registries, we identified 20,800 patients hospitalized with AMI during 2005-2007. We included the 834 women and 761 men without significant stenoses on CAG who were discharged and alive after 60 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All-cause mortality, recurrent AMI, and redeeming a prescription for a lipid-lowering drug, beta-blocker, clopidogrel, or aspirin within 60 days of discharge.
RESULTS: During follow-up, 97 women and 60 men died, resulting in a crude female/male hazard ratio (HR) of 1.51 (95% CI 1.09-2.08). After adjustment for age, time-period, and comorbidity, the gender difference was attenuated (HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.86-1.72). AMI recurrence was experienced by 28 women and 29 men with a female/male HR 0.88 (95% CI 0.52-1.48). After multivariable adjustment results were similar (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.50-1.43). More women than men redeemed a prescription for lipid-lowering drugs with no differences in other medication. In the adjusted models lipid-lowering drugs, beta-blockers, clopidogrel, and aspirin were all redeemed equally with odds ratio (OR) 1.25 (95% CI 0.99-1.59), OR 1.10 (95% CI 0.88-1.37), OR 1.09 (95% CI 0.88-1.34), and OR 1.13 (95% CI 0.90-1.42), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Our study shows that in a population of patients with a first admission for AMI and no significant stenoses on CAG, women share the same prospects as men regarding long-term prognosis and the extent of secondary preventive medical treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21724682     DOI: 10.1177/1741826711416046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol        ISSN: 2047-4873            Impact factor:   7.804


  3 in total

Review 1.  The Danish Heart Registry.

Authors:  Cengiz Özcan; Knud Juel; Jens Flensted Lassen; Lene Mia von Kappelgaard; Poul Erik Mortensen; Gunnar Gislason
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 4.790

Review 2.  Nonobstructive Versus Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Carmine Pizzi; Borejda Xhyheri; Grazia Maria Costa; Massimiliano Faustino; Maria Elena Flacco; Maria Rosaria Gualano; Giorgia Fragassi; Francesco Grigioni; Lamberto Manzoli
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 3.  Acute myocardial infarction in young women: current perspectives.

Authors:  Jaya Chandrasekhar; Amrita Gill; Roxana Mehran
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2018-06-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.