Literature DB >> 21724628

Daily interruption of sedation in patients receiving mechanical ventilation.

Leonie Weisbrodt1, Sharon McKinley, Andrea P Marshall, Louise Cole, Ian M Seppelt, Anthony Delaney.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Daily interruption of continuous infusion of sedatives has improved outcomes in patients receiving mechanical ventilation in open-label studies.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility of a protocol for a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial study on the impact of routine daily interruption of sedation in patients receiving mechanical ventilation.
METHODS: A total of 50 patients receiving mechanical ventilation were randomized to daily interruption of fentanyl and/or midazolam infusions for up to 6 hours or to usual management of sedation. Blinding was achieved by using replacement infusions (saline or active drug in saline).
RESULTS: The recruitment target of 80 patients was not met in an extended time frame. Propofol was used outside the protocol in 27% of patients in the intervention group and 17% of patients in the control group (P = .10). A total of 15% of the intervention group and 12% of the control group never had replacement infusions started (P = .77), and replacement infusions were started on only approximately one-third of eligible days in patients who received replacement infusions. The mean doses of fentanyl and midazolam were similar. The blinding strategy was safe and effective: no patients had unplanned extubations, and the most frequent reason for ending replacement infusions was completion of the maximum 6-hour period.
CONCLUSIONS: The double-blinded design for assessment of sedation interruption in patients receiving mechanical ventilation was safe and effective. Slow recruitment of patients and frequent noncompliance with the protocol suggest that modifications to the protocol are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21724628     DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2011415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Crit Care        ISSN: 1062-3264            Impact factor:   2.228


  6 in total

Review 1.  Daily sedation interruption versus no daily sedation interruption for critically ill adult patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Lisa Burry; Louise Rose; Iain J McCullagh; Dean A Fergusson; Niall D Ferguson; Sangeeta Mehta
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-07-09

2.  The Effect of Sedation Protocol on Sedation Level and Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Interventions on Mechanically Ventilated Patients.

Authors:  Masoumeh Namadian; Zahra Taran
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2021-07-20

3.  Sedation protocols versus daily sedation interruption: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Antonio Paulo Nassar; Marcelo Park
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

4.  A randomized controlled trial of daily sedation interruption in critically ill children.

Authors:  Nienke J Vet; Saskia N de Wildt; Carin W M Verlaat; Catherijne A J Knibbe; Miriam G Mooij; Job B M van Woensel; Joost van Rosmalen; Dick Tibboel; Matthijs de Hoog
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Long-term Effect of Optimized Sedation and Pain Management after Sudden Cardiac Arrest.

Authors:  Nadine Abanador-Kamper; Judith Wolfertz; Petra Thürmann; Lars Kamper; Melchior Seyfarth
Journal:  Open Cardiovasc Med J       Date:  2015-06-26

6.  The Effect of Daily Sedation-Weaning Application on Morbidity and Mortality in Intensive Care Unit Patients.

Authors:  Selcuk Kayir; Hulya Ulusoy; Guvenc Dogan
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-01-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.