Literature DB >> 21724120

Pseudotumor of the distal common bile duct at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Justin H Tan1, Fergus V Coakley, Zhen J Wang, Liina Poder, Emily Webb, Benjamin M Yeh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have described a pseudocalculus appearance in the distal common bile duct as a normal variant at cholangiography. The objective of this study was to describe the occurrence of pseudotumor in the distal common bile duct at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
METHODS: Nine patients who underwent ERCP between May 2004 and July 2008 were identified as having a transient eccentric mural-based filling defect in the distal common bile duct. A single reader systematically reviewed all studies and recorded the imaging findings.
RESULTS: The mean diameter of the filling defect was 9 mm (range, 5 to 11). Eight patients had resolution of the filling defect during the same ERCP or on a subsequent ERCP, and in two of these patients the inferior border of the filling defect was not well visualized. The other patient underwent surgical resection of a presumed tumor with no evidence of malignancy on surgical pathology.
CONCLUSION: An eccentric mural-based filling defect in the distal common bile duct can be artifactual in nature and may reflect transient contraction of the sphincter of Oddi. Recognition of this pseudotumor may help avoid unnecessary surgery.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21724120      PMCID: PMC3129542          DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Imaging        ISSN: 0899-7071            Impact factor:   1.605


  12 in total

1.  The pseudocalculus sign.

Authors:  Polya Samardar
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  MRCP pitfalls.

Authors:  L Van Hoe; K Mermuys; P Vanhoenacker
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2004 May-Jun

3.  Frequency of common bile duct motion artifacts caused by inferior vena cava pulsation on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Satoru Morita; Eiko Ueno; Naoko Saito; Kazufumi Suzuki; Haruhiko Machida; Mikihiko Fujimura; Kazuhiro Maruyama; Yugo Onodera; Kunihiro Watanabe; Takashi Suzuki; Takahiro Ohnishi; Chiaki Imura; Norio Mitsuhashi
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.471

4.  Cystic duct entry--another cause of pseudocalculus.

Authors:  I Berkowitz; P C Bornman; R E Kottler
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 10.093

5.  Pseudocalculus of the common bile duct.

Authors:  M Lautatzis; J P Shoenut; J Scurrah; A B Micflikier
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Pseudocalculus defect in cholangiography.

Authors:  Z Mujahed; J A Evans
Journal:  Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med       Date:  1972-10

7.  Pseudocalculus sign. A pitfall of static cholangiography.

Authors:  M B Martin; N D Kon; D J Ott; J M Sterchi
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 0.688

8.  Right hepatic artery as a cause of pseudocalculus in the biliary tree.

Authors:  J W Baer; M Abiri
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1982

9.  Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis.

Authors:  J M Scheiman; R C Carlos; J L Barnett; G H Elta; T T Nostrant; W D Chey; I R Francis; P S Nandi
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Pseudo-obstruction of the extrahepatic bile duct due to artifact from arterial pulsatile compression: a diagnostic pitfall of MR cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Y Watanabe; M Dohke; T Ishimori; Y Amoh; A Okumura; K Oda; T Hayashi; A Hiyama; Y Dodo
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.