Literature DB >> 21723767

Bone mineral density discordance and exploration of one of its causes.

Robert P Heaney1, K Michael Davies.   

Abstract

Discordances between hip and spine areal density T-score values are common and incompletely understood. In a cohort of 1157 postmenopausal women, discordances of greater than 10% occurred in 91%, with spine bone mineral density (BMD) T-scores significantly less negative than femoral neck (FN) T-scores (p<0.001). However, when T-scores based on bone mineral content (BMC) rather than BMD were used, the mean discordance was not significantly different from 0. This was largely because BMC at the FN had seemingly declined with age less rapidly than had BMD at that site. This can be explained by age-related areal expansion at the hip, which would be missed in the reported BMD output. One consequence is that if BMC-based T-scores are used to classify patients, substantially fewer individuals would have been judged osteoporotic in this cohort (two-thirds fewer for spine and three-fourths fewer for hip). Copyright Â
© 2011 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21723767     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2011.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  1 in total

1.  Achieving the protection of high peak bone mass.

Authors:  R P Heaney
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 4.507

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.