Literature DB >> 21723614

Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the implantable miniature telescope.

Gary C Brown1, Melissa M Brown, Heidi B Lieske, Philip A Lieske, Kathryn S Brown, Stephen S Lane.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the preference-based comparative effectiveness (human value gain) and the cost-utility (cost-effectiveness) of a telescope prosthesis (implantable miniature telescope) for the treatment of end-stage, age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
DESIGN: A value-based medicine, second-eye model, cost-utility analysis was performed to quantify the comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of therapy with the telescope prosthesis. PARTICIPANTS: Published, evidence-based data from the IMT002 Study Group clinical trial. Ophthalmic utilities were obtained from a validated cohort of >1000 patients with ocular diseases.
METHODS: Comparative effectiveness data were converted from visual acuity to utility (value-based) format. The incremental costs (Medicare) of therapy versus no therapy were integrated with the value gain conferred by the telescope prosthesis to assess its average cost-utility. The incremental value gains and incremental costs of therapy referent to (1) a fellow eye cohort and (2) a fellow eye cohort of those who underwent intra-study cataract surgery were integrated in incremental cost-utility analyses. All value outcomes and costs were discounted at a 3% annual rate, as per the Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparative effectiveness was quantified using the (1) quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gain and (2) percent human value gain (improvement in quality of life). The QALY gain was integrated with incremental costs into the cost-utility ratio ($/QALY, or US dollars expended per QALY gained).
RESULTS: The mean, discounted QALY gain associated with use of the telescope prosthesis over 12 years was 0.7577. When the QALY loss of 0.0004 attributable to the adverse events was factored into the model, the final QALY gain was 0.7573. This resulted in a 12.5% quality of life gain for the average patient during the 12 years of the model. The average cost-utility versus no therapy for use of the telescope prosthesis was $14389/QALY. The incremental cost-utility referent to control fellow eyes was $14063/QALY, whereas the incremental cost-utility referent to fellow eyes that underwent intra-study cataract surgery was $11805/QALY.
CONCLUSIONS: Therapy with the telescope prosthesis considerably improves quality of life and at the same time is cost-effective by conventional standards.
Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21723614     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  10 in total

Review 1.  Cost-Effectiveness Models in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Issues and Challenges.

Authors:  Jordana K Schmier; Carolyn K Hulme-Lowe
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  The Royal College of Ophthalmologists Guidelines on AMD: Executive Summary.

Authors:  U Chakravarthy; M Williams
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Electrophysiological testing of visual function after mirror telescope implantation: a case report.

Authors:  Jan Kremláček; Naďa Jirásková; Jana Nekolová; Radovan Šikl; Miroslav Kuba
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 4.  Implantable vision-enhancing devices and postoperative rehabilitation in advanced age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Andreas F Borkenstein; Eva-Maria Borkenstein; Albert J Augustin
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.456

5.  Improving quality of life in patients with end-stage age-related macular degeneration: focus on miniature ocular implants.

Authors:  Michael A Singer; Nancy Amir; Angela Herro; Salman S Porbandarwalla; Joseph Pollard
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-12-30

Review 6.  Implantable miniature telescope (IMT) for vision loss due to end-stage age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Amisha Gupta; Jessica Lam; Peter Custis; Stephen Munz; Donald Fong; Marguerite Koster
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-30

Review 7.  Therapeutic Modalities of Exudative Age-related Macular Degeneration.

Authors:  Milka Mavija; Emina Alimanovic; Vesna Jaksic; Sanja Sefic Kasumovic; Sonja Cekic; Miroslav Stamenkovic
Journal:  Med Arch       Date:  2014-05-31

8.  Triple combination therapy and zeaxanthin for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: an interventional comparative study and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  R Joseph Olk; Enrique Peralta; Dennis L Gierhart; Gary C Brown; Melissa M Brown
Journal:  Int J Retina Vitreous       Date:  2015-11-09

Review 9.  A Discussion of Commercially Available Intra-ocular Telescopic Implants for Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Authors:  Hannah M P Dunbar; Felipe E Dhawahir-Scala
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2018-04-26

Review 10.  The Treatment Paradigm for the Implantable Miniature Telescope.

Authors:  Vincent S Hau; Nikolas London; Michelle Dalton
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2016-04-11
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.