Literature DB >> 21723470

Learning curve of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with 60 initial cases by a single surgeon.

Yen-Chuan Ou1, Chi-Rei Yang, John Wang, Chen-Li Cheng, Vipul R Patel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We tracked various proficiency indicators for the learning curve as a single Taiwanese surgeon became familiar with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy surgeries by performing 60 initial procedures.
METHODS: Between December 2005 and December 2007, 60 consecutive patients were classified into Group 1 (Cases 1-30) or Group 2 (Cases 31-60). Pre-operative clinical characteristics, operative parameters, and postoperative parameters were assessed.
RESULTS: Pre-operative biopsy Gleason scores were significantly higher in Group 2 than in Group 1 (7.03 vs. 6.13, P < 0.01). The vesicourethral anastomosis time showed a statistically significant reduction from 46.38 minutes in Group 1 to 31 minutes in Group 2 (p < 0.01). The continence rate at 3 months in Group 2 was higher than that in Group 1 (97.6%vs. 76.7%, p = 0.052); the mean duration to continence was shorter in Group 2 than Group 1 (70.26 ± 67.37 days vs. 39.63 ± 36.48 days, p = 0.056). Group 2 had shorter postoperative stays (3.93 vs. 7.33) and longer durations of Foley catheter removal (9.0 vs. 7.7) than Group 1, representing a statistically significant difference (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: After gaining experience by performing an initial 30 robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies, the subsequent 30 surgeries established proficiency as determined by vesicourethral anastomosis time and early continence rate.
Copyright © 2011 Asian Surgical Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21723470     DOI: 10.1016/S1015-9584(11)60023-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Surg        ISSN: 1015-9584            Impact factor:   2.767


  5 in total

1.  The first year is the hardest: a comparison of early versus late experience after the introduction of robotic hiatal hernia repair.

Authors:  Kimberly Washington; Jeffrey R Watkins; D Rohan Jeyarajah
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-04-25

Review 2.  Learning curves in laparoscopic and robot-assisted prostate surgery: a systematic search and review.

Authors:  Nikolaos Grivas; Ioannis Zachos; Georgios Georgiadis; Markos Karavitakis; Vasilis Tzortzis; Charalampos Mamoulakis
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 3.661

3.  Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Rosa M Jiménez-Rodríguez; José Manuel Díaz-Pavón; Fernando de la Portilla de Juan; Emilio Prendes-Sillero; Hisnard Cadet Dussort; Javier Padillo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Robot-assisted nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: the Taiwan Robot Urological Surgery Team (TRUST) experience.

Authors:  Chen-Kuang Yang; Shiu-Dong Chung; Shun-Fa Hung; Wei-Che Wu; Yen-Chuan Ou; Chao-Yuan Huang; Yeong-Shiau Pu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  Impact of intraoperative fluid administration on outcome in patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy--a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Tobias Piegeler; Pamela Dreessen; Sereina M Graber; Sarah R Haile; Daniel Max Schmid; Beatrice Beck-Schimmer
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 2.217

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.