Literature DB >> 21723442

Comparative study of the psychosocial risks associated with families with multiple births resulting from assisted reproductive technology (ART) and without ART.

Montserrat Roca-de Bes1, José Gutierrez-Maldonado, José M Gris-Martínez.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the psychosocial risks associated with multiple births are increased as a consequence of the use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) in comparison with those not resulting from ART.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Fertility units of a university hospital and a private hospital. PATIENT(S): Parents of single children and multiples (twins and triplets) between 6 months and 4 years of age (n = 636) were divided into two groups: those who conceived through ART (n = 265) and those who conceived through non-ART (n = 371). INTERVENTION(S): Administration of six scales, in office or by mail. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Measurement scales of material necessities, social stigma, marital satisfaction, perceived stress, depression, quality of life, and their subscales. RESULT(S): The analysis of variance, Student's t-test, and χ(2)-test were applied. No effect was observed based on the use of ART in the psychosocial variables studied. Significant differences were obtained between the groups of single (SB) and multiple births (MB) with respect to material necessities, social stigma, marital satisfaction, depression, and quality of life. CONCLUSION(S): Having more than one child per birth, whether resulting from the use of ART or not, increases psychosocial risks for the parents. Assisted reproduction centers should include this information with the obstetric and neonatal risks, stressing the advantages of having one child per birth. Psychosocial risks are not increased as a result of having used ART, but the goal of avoiding the repeated use of ART does influence the desire to transfer the maximum number of embryos possible. Psychological counseling should be included before initiating ART, as well as when a multiple pregnancy is confirmed.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21723442     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  6 in total

1.  The multiple birth epidemic: revisited.

Authors:  Sarit Avraham; Daniel S Seidman
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2012-08

Review 2.  Raising multiples: mental health of mothers and fathers in early parenthood.

Authors:  Susan J Wenze; Cynthia L Battle; Katherine M Tezanos
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  The relationship of the psychological coping and adjustment strategies of infertile women with the success of assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Nahid Golmakani; Samira Ebrahimzadeh Zagami; Habibollah Esmaily; Atiyeh Vatanchi; Maryam Kabirian
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2019-03-19

4.  Families with children resulting from ART: psychosocial and financial implications.

Authors:  Virginia Miller; Michael P Diamond; Karl R Hansen; Anne Z Steiner; Marcelle Cedars; Richard S Legro; Stephen A Krawetz; Christos Coutifaris; Hao Huang; Nanette Santoro; Heping Zhang
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2020-04-13

Review 5.  Promoting the use of elective single embryo transfer in clinical practice.

Authors:  Tamara Tobias; Fady I Sharara; Jason M Franasiak; Patrick W Heiser; Emily Pinckney-Clark
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2016-08-15

6.  Psychosocial needs of women and their partners after successful assisted reproduction treatment in Barcelona.

Authors:  Esther Crespo; Joan Bestard
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2017-06-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.