Literature DB >> 21722584

Use of a novel fluorescent glucose sensor in volunteer subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Thomas Peyser1, Howard Zisser, Uzma Khan, Lois Jovanovič, Wendy Bevier, Matt Romey, Jeff Suri, Paul Strasma, Stephanie Tiaden, Soya Gamsey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stress hyperglycemia in the critically ill has been found to be associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Studies have found significant improvements in morbidity and mortality in postsurgical patients whose glucose levels were closely maintained in the euglycemic range. However, subsequent studies, in particular the Normoglycemia in Intensive Care Evaluation and Survival Using Glucose Algorithm Regulation (NICE-SUGAR) study, found no improvement in subjects with tight glycemic control. In addition to differences in protocol design, patients in the tight glycemic control arm of the NICE-SUGAR study experienced high rates of hypoglycemia compared with other studies. One interpretation of the NICE-SUGAR study results is that it is difficult to achieve normal glycemia in critically ill patients with existing glucose monitoring technology. The purpose of the study reported here was to evaluate the safety and performance of a continuous intravascular glucose sensor that could be used in the future in critically ill patients.
METHODS: A first-generation prototype of an intravascular continuous glucose sensor was evaluated in 29 volunteer subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus. The sensor operates on the principle of quenched fluorescence. The fluorescent emission from the sensor chemistry is nonlinear, resulting in improved accuracy in the hypoglycemic range. The duration of each study was 8 hours. Sensor output was compared with temporally correlated reference measurements made from venous samples on a laboratory glucose analyzer.
RESULTS: Data were obtained from 18 of the 29 subjects in the study. Data were analyzed retrospectively using a factory calibration plus a one-point in vivo calibration. The mean absolute relative difference was 7.97%, and 95.1% of all the points were in zone A of the Clarke error grid.
CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study was the first use in human subjects of a prototype of the GluCath Intravascular Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (GluCath System). The GluCath System is based on a novel fluorescent sensor chemistry. The study found the GluCath System had a high level of accuracy as compared with a laboratory reference analyzer.
© 2011 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21722584      PMCID: PMC3192635          DOI: 10.1177/193229681100500323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  10 in total

1.  Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients.

Authors:  G van den Berghe; P Wouters; F Weekers; C Verwaest; F Bruyninckx; M Schetz; D Vlasselaers; P Ferdinande; P Lauwers; R Bouillon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-11-08       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Glycemic variability in critical illness and the end of Chapter 1.

Authors:  James S Krinsley
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 3.  Indication and practical use of intensive insulin therapy in the critically ill.

Authors:  Liese Mebis; Jan Gunst; Lies Langouche; Ilse Vanhorebeek; Greet Van den Berghe
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.687

4.  Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Simon Finfer; Dean R Chittock; Steve Yu-Shuo Su; Deborah Blair; Denise Foster; Vinay Dhingra; Rinaldo Bellomo; Deborah Cook; Peter Dodek; William R Henderson; Paul C Hébert; Stephane Heritier; Daren K Heyland; Colin McArthur; Ellen McDonald; Imogen Mitchell; John A Myburgh; Robyn Norton; Julie Potter; Bruce G Robinson; Juan J Ronco
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Clinical review: Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients: NICE-SUGAR or Leuven blood glucose target?

Authors:  Greet Van den Berghe; Miet Schetz; Dirk Vlasselaers; Greet Hermans; Alexander Wilmer; Roger Bouillon; Dieter Mesotten
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Glucose control lowers the risk of wound infection in diabetics after open heart operations.

Authors:  K J Zerr; A P Furnary; G L Grunkemeier; S Bookin; V Kanhere; A Starr
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Continuous glucose detection using boronic acid-substituted viologens in fluorescent hydrogels: linker effects and extension to fiber optics.

Authors:  Soya Gamsey; Jeff T Suri; Ritchie A Wessling; Bakthan Singaram
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 3.882

Review 8.  Stress-induced hyperglycemia.

Authors:  K C McCowen; A Malhotra; B R Bistrian
Journal:  Crit Care Clin       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.598

9.  Continuous insulin infusion reduces mortality in patients with diabetes undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Anthony P Furnary; Guangqiang Gao; Gary L Grunkemeier; YingXing Wu; Kathryn J Zerr; Stephen O Bookin; H Storm Floten; Albert Starr
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Continuous glucose monitors prove highly accurate in critically ill children.

Authors:  Brian C Bridges; Catherine M Preissig; Kevin O Maher; Mark R Rigby
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 9.097

  10 in total
  14 in total

1.  Clinical hurdles and possible solutions in the implementation of closed-loop control in type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Howard Zisser
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-09-01

2.  Acute in vivo performance evaluation of the fluorescence affinity sensor in the intravascular and interstitial space in Swine.

Authors:  Ralph Dutt-Ballerstadt; Colton Evans; Arun P Pillai; Ashok Gowda; Roger McNichols; Jesse Rios; William Cohn
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-01-01

Review 3.  Why Have So Many Intravascular Glucose Monitoring Devices Failed?

Authors:  John L Smith; Mark J Rice
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-07

4.  Use of an Intravascular Fluorescent Continuous Glucose Sensor in ICU Patients.

Authors:  Paul J Strasma; Simon Finfer; Oliver Flower; Brian Hipszer; Mikhail Kosiborod; Lewis Macken; Marjolein Sechterberger; Peter H J van der Voort; J Hans DeVries; Jeffrey I Joseph
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-05-12

5.  Use of an intravascular fluorescent continuous glucose sensor in subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Matthew Romey; Lois Jovanovič; Wendy Bevier; Kateryna Markova; Paul Strasma; Howard Zisser
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-11-01

6.  Analysis: continuous glucose monitoring in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  W Kenneth Ward
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-11-01

Review 7.  Overview of fluorescence glucose sensing: a technology with a bright future.

Authors:  David C Klonoff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-11-01

8.  Feasibility of adjacent insulin infusion and continuous glucose monitoring via the Medtronic Combo-Set.

Authors:  David N O'Neal; Sumona Adhya; Alicia Jenkins; Glenn Ward; John B Welsh; Gayane Voskanyan
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-03-01

Review 9.  Advances in management of type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Ravindranath Aathira; Vandana Jain
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2014-10-15

Review 10.  Vascular Glucose Sensor Symposium: Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems (CGMS) for Hospitalized and Ambulatory Patients at Risk for Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemia, and Glycemic Variability.

Authors:  Jeffrey I Joseph; Marc C Torjman; Paul J Strasma
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.