Literature DB >> 21722499

Greater remission rates in patients with early versus long-standing disease in biologic-naive rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with abatacept: a post hoc analysis of randomized clinical trial data.

Y Yazici1, D Moniz Reed, C Klem, L Rosenblatt, G Wu, J M Kremer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Current aim of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment is to achieve remission in as many patients as possible. Rates of remission and clinical outcomes after treatment with abatacept in biologic-naive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with early disease and an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX) versus patients with ≥ 10 years of disease were assessed.
METHODS: Data from two trials assessing the efficacy of abatacept in MTX inadequate responders were pooled for this exploratory post hoc analysis. Patients with disease duration of ≤ 2 years at baseline (early disease), originally assigned to an abatacept approximately 10 mg/kg treatment arm and entered into a long-term extension (LTE), were compared with patients with ≥ 10 years of disease (long-standing RA). Remission, DAS28-CRP, ACR 70 responses and the Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3), improvement in physical function as measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI).
RESULTS: Twenty-three percent of these patients (n=108) had early disease. A higher percentage of patients with early disease achieved DAS28-CRP remission versus patients with long-standing disease (35.2% vs. 19.4% at year 1, p<0.01; 46.0% vs. 30.9% at year 3, p<0.05). In addition, a higher percentage of the subgroup with early RA achieved ACR70 responses. More patients with early RA had a meaningful improvement in their HAQ-DI (75.2% vs. 60.4%; p<0.05) and RAPID3 scores at one year (mean changes from baseline of -9.6 vs. -8.1; p=0.009).
CONCLUSIONS: These data provide additional support for the possible use of abatacept in biologic-naive patients who have had inadequate response to MTX, earlier in their disease course.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21722499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol        ISSN: 0392-856X            Impact factor:   4.473


  5 in total

Review 1.  Subcutaneous abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis: A real-life experience.

Authors:  Juan Camilo Sarmiento-Monroy; Luisa Parada-Arias; Milena Rodríguez-López; Mónica Rodríguez-Jiménez; Nicolás Molano-González; Adriana Rojas-Villarraga; Rubén Darío Mantilla
Journal:  J Transl Autoimmun       Date:  2019-09-06

2.  On-drug and drug-free remission by baseline symptom duration: abatacept with methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Vivian P Bykerk; Gerd R Burmester; Bernard G Combe; Daniel E Furst; Tom W J Huizinga; Harris A Ahmad; Paul Emery
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  A window of opportunity for abatacept in RA: is disease duration an independent predictor of low disease activity/remission in clinical practice?

Authors:  Leslie R Harrold; Heather J Litman; Sean E Connolly; Sheila Kelly; Winnie Hua; Evo Alemao; Lisa Rosenblatt; Sabrina Rebello; Joel M Kremer
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  ¹H-NMR-Based Metabolomic Study for Identifying Serum Profiles Associated with the Response to Etanercept in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Roberta Priori; Luca Casadei; Mariacristina Valerio; Rossana Scrivo; Guido Valesini; Cesare Manetti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Certolizumab pegol in rheumatoid arthritis patients with low to moderate activity: the CERTAIN double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  J S Smolen; P Emery; G F Ferraccioli; W Samborski; F Berenbaum; O R Davies; W Koetse; O Purcaru; B Bennett; H Burkhardt
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 19.103

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.