Literature DB >> 21721000

Comparison of clinical schemas and morphologic features in predicting Lynch syndrome in mutation-positive patients with endometrial cancer encountered in the context of familial gastrointestinal cancer registries.

Paul Ryan1, Anna Marie Mulligan, Melyssa Aronson, Sarah E Ferguson, Bharati Bapat, Kara Semotiuk, Spring Holter, Janice Kwon, Steve E Kalloger, C Blake Gilks, Steven Gallinger, Aaron Pollett, Blaise A Clarke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common extraintestinal malignancy in Lynch syndrome (LS) and often is the sentinel malignancy, yet there is no consensus regarding LS-EC detection algorithms. In this study, the authors determined the efficacy of family/personal history and tumor morphology in predicting LS in a cohort of patients with EC who had mutation-proven LS.
METHODS: Amsterdam II (AmII) criteria, revised Bethesda guidelines (rBG), and Society of Gynecologic Oncologists (SGO) clinical screening criteria were applied to the pedigrees of 76 patients with mutation-proven LS who had pathology-proven EC. When tumors were tested for microsatellite instability (MSI) phenotype status or mismatch-repair protein-immunohistochemical (MMR-IHC) expression, those results also were reviewed, and LS-associated histopathologic features were documented in 38 available patients.
RESULTS: Of 76 patients, 36%, 58%, 71%, and 93% would have been selected for further testing for LS by pedigree screening at the time of EC diagnosis with rBG, AmII, SGO 20%-to-25%, and SGO 5%-to-10% criteria, respectively. Ninety percent (18 of 20 tumors) of tested ECs had high MSI, and 96% (22 of 23 tumors) had abnormal MMR-IHC expression. At least 1 LS-EC morphologic feature was present in 16 of 38 tumors (42%).
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical screening criteria had variable efficacy for the identification of LS-associated EC, and SGO 5%-to-10% criteria performed best. Characteristic pathologic features were present in a minority of patients. Although a high proportion of LS-ECs had the MSI phenotype and were MMR deficient, the specificity of these tests and of clinical screening for LS in unselected patients with EC has been poorly described. Prospective studies to determine the optimal combination of these screening modalities are required.
Copyright © 2011 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21721000     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  20 in total

Review 1.  Assessing Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Solid Tumors: A Practical Review for Pathologists and Proposal for a Standardized Method from the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarkers Working Group: Part 2: TILs in Melanoma, Gastrointestinal Tract Carcinomas, Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma and Mesothelioma, Endometrial and Ovarian Carcinomas, Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck, Genitourinary Carcinomas, and Primary Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Shona Hendry; Roberto Salgado; Thomas Gevaert; Prudence A Russell; Tom John; Bibhusal Thapa; Michael Christie; Koen van de Vijver; M V Estrada; Paula I Gonzalez-Ericsson; Melinda Sanders; Benjamin Solomon; Cinzia Solinas; Gert G G M Van den Eynden; Yves Allory; Matthias Preusser; Johannes Hainfellner; Giancarlo Pruneri; Andrea Vingiani; Sandra Demaria; Fraser Symmans; Paolo Nuciforo; Laura Comerma; E A Thompson; Sunil Lakhani; Seong-Rim Kim; Stuart Schnitt; Cecile Colpaert; Christos Sotiriou; Stefan J Scherer; Michail Ignatiadis; Sunil Badve; Robert H Pierce; Giuseppe Viale; Nicolas Sirtaine; Frederique Penault-Llorca; Tomohagu Sugie; Susan Fineberg; Soonmyung Paik; Ashok Srinivasan; Andrea Richardson; Yihong Wang; Ewa Chmielik; Jane Brock; Douglas B Johnson; Justin Balko; Stephan Wienert; Veerle Bossuyt; Stefan Michiels; Nils Ternes; Nicole Burchardi; Stephen J Luen; Peter Savas; Frederick Klauschen; Peter H Watson; Brad H Nelson; Carmen Criscitiello; Sandra O'Toole; Denis Larsimont; Roland de Wind; Giuseppe Curigliano; Fabrice André; Magali Lacroix-Triki; Mark van de Vijver; Federico Rojo; Giuseppe Floris; Shahinaz Bedri; Joseph Sparano; David Rimm; Torsten Nielsen; Zuzana Kos; Stephen Hewitt; Baljit Singh; Gelareh Farshid; Sibylle Loibl; Kimberly H Allison; Nadine Tung; Sylvia Adams; Karen Willard-Gallo; Hugo M Horlings; Leena Gandhi; Andre Moreira; Fred Hirsch; Maria V Dieci; Maria Urbanowicz; Iva Brcic; Konstanty Korski; Fabien Gaire; Hartmut Koeppen; Amy Lo; Jennifer Giltnane; Marlon C Rebelatto; Keith E Steele; Jiping Zha; Kenneth Emancipator; Jonathan W Juco; Carsten Denkert; Jorge Reis-Filho; Sherene Loi; Stephen B Fox
Journal:  Adv Anat Pathol       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.875

Review 2.  Lynch syndrome-associated neoplasms: a discussion on histopathology and immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Jinru Shia; Susanne Holck; Giovanni Depetris; Joel K Greenson; David S Klimstra
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Role of endometrial cancer abnormal MMR protein in screening Lynch-syndrome families.

Authors:  Qiongxian Long; Yong Peng; Zhirong Tang; Cailiang Wu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-09-15

Review 4.  Practical issues related to uterine pathology: staging, frozen section, artifacts, and Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Robert A Soslow
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 7.842

5.  Tumor mismatch repair immunohistochemistry and DNA MLH1 methylation testing of patients with endometrial cancer diagnosed at age younger than 60 years optimizes triage for population-level germline mismatch repair gene mutation testing.

Authors:  Daniel D Buchanan; Yen Y Tan; Michael D Walsh; Mark Clendenning; Alexander M Metcalf; Kaltin Ferguson; Sven T Arnold; Bryony A Thompson; Felicity A Lose; Michael T Parsons; Rhiannon J Walters; Sally-Ann Pearson; Margaret Cummings; Martin K Oehler; Penelope B Blomfield; Michael A Quinn; Judy A Kirk; Colin J Stewart; Andreas Obermair; Joanne P Young; Penelope M Webb; Amanda B Spurdle
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Evaluation of clinical criteria for the identification of Lynch syndrome among unselected patients with endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Amanda S Bruegl; Bojana Djordjevic; Brittany Batte; Molly Daniels; Bryan Fellman; Diana Urbauer; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Charlotte Sun; Karen H Lu; Russell R Broaddus
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2014-04-25

7.  Uterine endometrial carcinoma with DNA mismatch repair deficiency: magnetic resonance imaging findings and clinical features.

Authors:  Kiyoyuki Minamiguchi; Junko Takahama; Tomoko Uchiyama; Ryosuke Taiji; Natsuhiko Saito; Hiroshi Okada; Nagaaki Marugami; Yasuhito Tanase; Ryuji Kawaguchi; Chiho Ohbayashi; Hiroshi Kobayashi; Toshiko Hirai; Kimihiko Kichikawa
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 2.374

8.  Clinical Challenges Associated with Universal Screening for Lynch Syndrome-Associated Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Amanda S Bruegl; Kari L Ring; Molly Daniels; Bryan M Fellman; Diana L Urbauer; Russell R Broaddus
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2016-12-13

9.  Consequences of universal MSI/IHC in screening ENDOMETRIAL cancer patients for Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Brittany A L Batte; Amanda S Bruegl; Molly S Daniels; Kari L Ring; Katherine M Dempsey; Bojana Djordjevic; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Bryan M Fellman; Karen H Lu; Russell R Broaddus
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Endometrial cancer and a family history of cancer.

Authors:  Linda S Cook; Harold E Nelson; Christine A Stidley; Yan Dong; Pamela J Round; Ernest K Amankwah; Anthony M Magliocco; Christine M Friedenreich
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 5.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.