P Chalupa1, O Beran, H Herwald, N Kaspříková, M Holub. 1. Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and University Hospital Bulovka, Budínova 2, Prague 8, Czech Republic.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Timely knowledge of the bacterial etiology and localization of infection are important for empirical antibiotic therapy. Thus, the goal of this study was to evaluate routinely used biomarkers together with novel laboratory parameters in the diagnosis of infection. METHODS: In this prospective study, 54 adult patients with bacterial infections admitted to the Department of Infectious Diseases were included. For comparison, 27 patients with viral infections were enrolled. In these patients, white blood cell (WBC) counts, differential blood counts, serum levels of procalcitonin (PCT), IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, TNF-α, IFN-γ, soluble CD14 (sCD14), heparin-binding protein (HBP), cortisol (Cort), and monocyte surface expression of TLR2, TLR4, HLA-DR, and CD14 were analyzed. Also, these biomarkers were evaluated in 21 patients with acute community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP), as well as in 21 patients with pyelonephritis and urosepsis. RESULTS: The highest sensitivity and specificity (expressed as the area under the curve [AUC]) for bacterial infection were observed in serum concentration of PCT (0.952), neutrophil and lymphocyte counts (0.852 and 0.841, respectively), and serum levels of HBP (0.837), IL-6 (0.830), and Cort (0.817). In addition, the serum levels of IFN-γ and Cort were significantly higher and IL-8 levels were lower in CABP when compared to pyelonephritis or urosepsis. CONCLUSIONS: From the novel potential biomarkers, only PCT demonstrated superiority over the routine parameters in the differentiation of bacterial from viral infections. However, some of the novel parameters should be further evaluated in larger and better characterized cohorts of patients in order to find their clinical applications.
PURPOSE: Timely knowledge of the bacterial etiology and localization of infection are important for empirical antibiotic therapy. Thus, the goal of this study was to evaluate routinely used biomarkers together with novel laboratory parameters in the diagnosis of infection. METHODS: In this prospective study, 54 adult patients with bacterial infections admitted to the Department of Infectious Diseases were included. For comparison, 27 patients with viral infections were enrolled. In these patients, white blood cell (WBC) counts, differential blood counts, serum levels of procalcitonin (PCT), IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, TNF-α, IFN-γ, soluble CD14 (sCD14), heparin-binding protein (HBP), cortisol (Cort), and monocyte surface expression of TLR2, TLR4, HLA-DR, and CD14 were analyzed. Also, these biomarkers were evaluated in 21 patients with acute community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP), as well as in 21 patients with pyelonephritis and urosepsis. RESULTS: The highest sensitivity and specificity (expressed as the area under the curve [AUC]) for bacterial infection were observed in serum concentration of PCT (0.952), neutrophil and lymphocyte counts (0.852 and 0.841, respectively), and serum levels of HBP (0.837), IL-6 (0.830), and Cort (0.817). In addition, the serum levels of IFN-γ and Cort were significantly higher and IL-8 levels were lower in CABP when compared to pyelonephritis or urosepsis. CONCLUSIONS: From the novel potential biomarkers, only PCT demonstrated superiority over the routine parameters in the differentiation of bacterial from viral infections. However, some of the novel parameters should be further evaluated in larger and better characterized cohorts of patients in order to find their clinical applications.
Authors: G D Mills; H M Lala; M R Oehley; A B Craig; K Barratt; D Hood; C N Thornley; A Nesdale; N E Manikkam; P Reeve Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: K Stankovic Stojanovic; O Steichen; F Lionnet; C Bachmeyer; I Lecomte; V Avellino; G Grateau; R Girot; G Lefevre Journal: Infection Date: 2011-01-11 Impact factor: 3.553
Authors: Michal Holub; Ondrej Beran; Olga Dzupová; Jarmila Hnyková; Zdenka Lacinová; Jana Príhodová; Bohumír Procházka; Miroslav Helcl Journal: Crit Care Date: 2007 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: A Litke; R Bossart; K Regez; U Schild; M Guglielmetti; A Conca; P Schäfer; B Reutlinger; B Mueller; W C Albrich Journal: Infection Date: 2013-02-24 Impact factor: 3.553
Authors: Daniel Molano Franco; Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez; Marta Roqué I Figuls; Nadia G Montero Oleas; Xavier Nuvials; Javier Zamora Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-04-30