Literature DB >> 21719431

Sources of variance in temporal and spatial aspects of jaw kinematics in two species of primates feeding on foods of different properties.

José Iriarte-Díaz1, David A Reed, Callum F Ross.   

Abstract

Chewing kinematics reflects interactions between centrally generated motor signals and peripheral sensory feedback from the constantly changing oral environment. Chewing is a strongly modulated behavior that responds to differences in material properties among different type of foods and to changes in the external physical properties of the food as the bolus gets processed. Feeding, as any complex biological behavior, presents variation at multiple hierarchical levels, from among species or higher-order levels to variation among chewing cycles within a single feeding sequence. Thus, to understand the mechanics and evolution of feeding systems requires estimation of how this variation is distributed across each of these hierarchical levels, which in turn requires large sample sizes. The development of affordable, high-resolution, three-dimensional kinematic recording systems has increased our ability to collect large amounts of data on complete or near-complete feeding sequences that can be used to shed light on the mechanisms of control in vertebrate feeding. In this study, we present data on the nature and sources of variation (from species to chewing cycle levels) in kinematics of chewing in two species of primates, Cebus and Macaca, while they feed on foods of known material properties. Variation in chewing kinematics was not evenly distributed among hierarchical levels. Most of the variation was observed among chewing cycles, most likely in response to changes in the external properties of the food bolus throughout the feeding sequence. Species differences were found in duration and vertical displacement during slow-close phase suggesting that each species exhibits different power stroke dynamics. Cebus exhibited more variable gape cycles than did Macaca, in particular when eating low-toughness foods. This increased ability to temporally and spatially modulate the gape cycle may reflect increased efficiency in processing food because Cebus monkeys use fewer, but longer cycles, than does Macaca when feeding on low-toughness foods. This is due to an increase in duration of the jaw-opening phases of the gape cycle, when the tongue repositions the food bolus in the oral cavity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21719431     DOI: 10.1093/icb/icr072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Comp Biol        ISSN: 1540-7063            Impact factor:   3.326


  15 in total

1.  In vivo bone strain and finite element modeling of a rhesus macaque mandible during mastication.

Authors:  Olga Panagiotopoulou; José Iriarte-Diaz; Simon Wilshin; Paul C Dechow; Andrea B Taylor; Hyab Mehari Abraha; Sharifah F Aljunid; Callum F Ross
Journal:  Zoology (Jena)       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Flexibility of feeding movements in pigs: effects of changes in food toughness and stiffness on the timing of jaw movements.

Authors:  Stéphane J Montuelle; Rachel Olson; Hannah Curtis; JoAnna Sidote; Susan H Williams
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Dynamics of motor cortical activity during naturalistic feeding behavior.

Authors:  Shizhao Liu; Jose Iriate-Diaz; Nicholas G Hatsopoulos; Callum F Ross; Kazutaka Takahashi; Zhe Chen
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Recurrence network analysis of multiple local field potential bands from the orofacial portion of primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Narayan Puthanmadam Subramaniyam; Jari Hyttinen; Nicholas G Hatsopoulos; Callum F Ross; Kazutaka Takahashi
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2015

5.  Unilateral lingual nerve transection alters jaw-tongue coordination during mastication in pigs.

Authors:  Stéphane J Montuelle; Rachel A Olson; Hannah Curtis; Susan H Williams
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2020-03-19

6.  Development, reliability, and validation of an infant mammalian penetration-aspiration scale.

Authors:  Shaina Devi Holman; Regina Campbell-Malone; Peng Ding; Estela M Gierbolini-Norat; Anne M Griffioen; Haruhi Inokuchi; Stacey L Lukasik; Rebecca Z German
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 7.  Overview of FEED, the feeding experiments end-user database.

Authors:  Christine E Wall; Christopher J Vinyard; Susan H Williams; Vladimir Gapeyev; Xianhua Liu; Hilmar Lapp; Rebecca Z German
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 3.326

8.  Jaw kinematics and tongue protraction-retraction during chewing and drinking in the pig.

Authors:  Rachel A Olson; Stéphane J Montuelle; Brad A Chadwell; Hannah Curtis; Susan H Williams
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.308

9.  Buccal dental-microwear and dietary ecology in a free-ranging population of mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx) from southern Gabon.

Authors:  Alice M Percher; Alejandro Romero; Jordi Galbany; Gontran Nsi Akoue; Alejandro Pérez-Pérez; Marie J E Charpentier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Evidence that metallic proxies are unsuitable for assessing the mechanics of microwear formation and a new theory of the meaning of microwear.

Authors:  Adam van Casteren; Peter W Lucas; David S Strait; Shaji Michael; Nick Bierwisch; Norbert Schwarzer; Khaled J Al-Fadhalah; Abdulwahab S Almusallam; Lidia A Thai; Sreeja Saji; Ali Shekeban; Michael V Swain
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.