STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the surgical outcomes and long-term results of laparoscopic treatment of endometrial cancer in obese patients, and compare these results with those of nonobese women. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: Two referral cancer centers. PATIENTS: Fifty-two obese and 155 nonobese women with clinical stage I endometrial cancer managed by laparoscopy from 1990-2005 in two referral centers. INTERVENTIONS: Demographic, surgical, perioperative and pathological characteristics of obese women and nonobese women with endometrial cancer treated by laparoscopy were analyzed and then compared. Recurrence-free and overall survival was calculated by use of Kaplan-Meier method. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Median BMI of the study population was 26.2 Kg/m(2). Median BMI among obese patients was 34.2 Kg/m(2). The conversion rate was independent from the BMI of the patient (3.8% vs 4.5%, p = .80). Neither mean operative time (187.5 vs 172 min, p = .11) neither hospital stay (5.2 vs 4.9 days, p = .44) were related with BMI. Lymphadenectomy was considered not feasible in 7 obese (17%) and 8 nonobese (7%) women (p = 0.09). Fewer lymph nodes were retrieved among obese women (8 versus 11, p <.0002). No differences were found between the groups in terms of perioperative complications. Median follow-up was 69 and 71 months for the obese and nonobese, respectively (p = .59). Overall and disease-free 5-year survival rates did not differ between obese and nonobese patients (90.3% and 87.5% versus 88.5% and 89.8%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Despite some limitations, the laparoscopic approach seems to be particularly useful for obese patients with endometrial cancer, with similar survival and recurrence rates and without any more complications compared to the nonobese population.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the surgical outcomes and long-term results of laparoscopic treatment of endometrial cancer in obesepatients, and compare these results with those of nonobese women. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: Two referral cancer centers. PATIENTS: Fifty-two obese and 155 nonobese women with clinical stage I endometrial cancer managed by laparoscopy from 1990-2005 in two referral centers. INTERVENTIONS: Demographic, surgical, perioperative and pathological characteristics of obesewomen and nonobese women with endometrial cancer treated by laparoscopy were analyzed and then compared. Recurrence-free and overall survival was calculated by use of Kaplan-Meier method. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Median BMI of the study population was 26.2 Kg/m(2). Median BMI among obesepatients was 34.2 Kg/m(2). The conversion rate was independent from the BMI of the patient (3.8% vs 4.5%, p = .80). Neither mean operative time (187.5 vs 172 min, p = .11) neither hospital stay (5.2 vs 4.9 days, p = .44) were related with BMI. Lymphadenectomy was considered not feasible in 7 obese (17%) and 8 nonobese (7%) women (p = 0.09). Fewer lymph nodes were retrieved among obesewomen (8 versus 11, p <.0002). No differences were found between the groups in terms of perioperative complications. Median follow-up was 69 and 71 months for the obese and nonobese, respectively (p = .59). Overall and disease-free 5-year survival rates did not differ between obese and nonobese patients (90.3% and 87.5% versus 88.5% and 89.8%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Despite some limitations, the laparoscopic approach seems to be particularly useful for obesepatients with endometrial cancer, with similar survival and recurrence rates and without any more complications compared to the nonobese population.
Authors: Salvatore Gueli Alletti; C Rossitto; S Cianci; E Perrone; S Pizzacalla; G Monterossi; G Vizzielli; S Gidaro; G Scambia Journal: J Robot Surg Date: 2017-06-17
Authors: Angeles Alvarez Secord; Vic Hasselblad; Vivian E Von Gruenigen; Paola A Gehrig; Susan C Modesitt; Victoria Bae-Jump; Laura J Havrilesky Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2015-10-31 Impact factor: 5.482