Literature DB >> 21719354

Professional component payment reductions for diagnostic imaging examinations when more than one service is rendered by the same provider in the same session: an analysis of relevant payment policy.

Bibb Allen1, William D Donovan, Geraldine McGinty, Robert M Barr, Ezequiel Silva, Richard Duszak, Angela J Kim, Pam Kassing.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess potential physician work efficiencies when more than one diagnostic imaging study is interpreted by the same provider during the same session.
METHODS: Medicare Physician Fee Schedule data from the American Medical Association Resource-Based Relative Value Scale Data Manager for 2011 were analyzed to quantify relative contributions of preservice, intraservice, and postservice physician work to the total work of rendering diagnostic imaging services. An expert panel review identified potential duplications in preservice and postservice work when multiple examinations are performed on the same patient during the same session. Maximum potential percentage work duplication for various diagnostic imaging modalities was calculated and compared to US Government Accountability Office estimates.
RESULTS: The relative contributions of preservice and postservice work to total work varied by modality, ranging from 20% [computed tomography (CT)] to 33% (ultrasound). The maximum percentage of potentially duplicated preservice and postservice activity ranged from 19% (nuclear medicine) to 24% (ultrasound). Maximum mean potentially duplicated work relative value units ranged from 0.0212 for radiography to 0.0953 for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Maximum percentage work reduction ranged from 4.32% for CT to 8.15% for ultrasound. This corresponds to maximum professional Physician Fee Schedule reductions of only 2.96% (CT) to 5.45% (ultrasound), approximating an order of magnitude less than the Government Accountability Office's recommendations.
CONCLUSION: Although potential efficiencies in physician work occur when multiple services are provided to the same patient during the same session, these are highly variable and considerably less than previously estimated.
Copyright © 2011 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21719354     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2011.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  3 in total

1.  Alphabet soup: our government "in-action".

Authors:  J A Hirsch; W D Donovan; G N Nicola; R M Barr; P W Schaefer; E Silva
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Using Medical Claims for Policy Effectiveness Surveillance: Reimbursement and Utilization of Abdomen/Pelvis Computed Tomography Scans.

Authors:  Michal Horný; Jake R Morgan; Vanessa L Merker
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Large-Scale Assessment of Scan-Time Variability and Multiple-Procedure Efficiency for Cross-Sectional Neuroradiological Exams in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Ray Zhang; Vamsi R Narra; Akash P Kansagra
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.056

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.