Literature DB >> 21718991

How many eggs are needed to produce an assisted reproductive technology baby: is more always better?

Beth McAvey1, Athena Zapantis, Sangita K Jindal, Harry J Lieman, Alex J Polotsky.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between the number of mature (metaphase II [MII]) oocytes per assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycle and the likelihood of live birth.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Academic infertility practice. PATIENT(S): Seven hundred thirty-seven infertile women undergoing their initial fresh embryo, nondonor IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle at Montefiore's Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Health between January 2002 and December 2008. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Live birth. RESULT(S): Two hundred twenty-four cycles resulted in a live birth (30.4%). Live birth cycles had significantly more MII oocytes obtained per cycle as compared with their unsuccessful counterparts (11.0 ± 5.9 vs. 9.7 ± 6.2, respectively). Multivariate logistic regression was done to determine the minimum number of MII oocytes per cycle as a predictor of live birth after adjustment for age and historical maximum FSH values. Cycles that included the average number of MII in this cohort were used as a reference group. For cycles with five or fewer MII oocytes obtained, there was a statistically significant decrease in the likelihood of a live birth as compared with the reference group (odds ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.38-0.99). However, cycles with six or fewer obtained MII oocytes were not less likely to result in a live birth when compared with the reference group (odds ratio 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.45-1.08). CONCLUSION(S): In our cohort, there was an advantage to obtaining six or more MII oocytes during the fresh oocyte retrieval compared with five or fewer oocytes. There was not an advantage, however, to obtaining 10 or more or 15 or more oocytes as compared with obtaining 6-9 oocytes. The strategy of aiming for a greater number of oocytes in an ART cycle should be revisited.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21718991     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  7 in total

1.  The effect of immature oocytes quantity on the rates of oocytes maturity and morphology, fertilization, and embryo development in ICSI cycles.

Authors:  Iman Halvaei; Mohammad Ali Khalili; Mohammad Hossein Razi; Stefania A Nottola
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Accumulation of oocytes from a few modified natural cycles to improve IVF results: a pilot study.

Authors:  Ermanno Greco; Katarzyna Litwicka; Cristiana Arrivi; Maria Teresa Varricchio; Daniela Zavaglia; Cecilia Mencacci; Maria Giulia Minasi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Total number of oocytes and zygotes are predictive of live birth pregnancy in fresh donor oocyte in vitro fertilization cycles.

Authors:  Eduardo Hariton; Keewan Kim; Sunni L Mumford; Marissa Palmor; Pietro Bortoletto; Eden R Cardozo; Anatte E Karmon; Mary E Sabatini; Aaron K Styer
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Optimal Oocyte Number in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation with Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist/Antagonist and Day 3 Fresh Embryo Transfer.

Authors:  Hoon Kim; Soo Jin Han; Yun Soo Hong; Sung Woo Kim; Seung-Yup Ku; Chang Suk Suh; Seok Hyun Kim
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.060

5.  The total pregnancy potential per oocyte aspiration after assisted reproduction-in how many cycles are biologically competent oocytes available?

Authors:  J G Lemmen; N M Rodríguez; L D Andreasen; A Loft; S Ziebe
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 3.357

6.  What number of oocytes is appropriate for defining poor ovarian response?

Authors:  Seul Ki Kim; Jung Ryeol Lee; Byung Chul Jee; Chang Suk Suh; Seok Hyun Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.759

7.  Can ovarian double-stimulation in the same menstrual cycle improve IVF outcomes?

Authors:  Maria Cecília de Almeida Cardoso; Alessandra Evangelista; Cássio Sartório; George Vaz; Caio Luis Vieira Werneck; Fernando Marques Guimarães; Paulo Gallo de Sá; Maria Cecília Erthal
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2017-09-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.