Guido K W Frank1, Jeremy R Reynolds2, Megan E Shott3, Randall C O'Reilly4. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Denver, The Children's Hospital, Aurora, Colorado; Department of Neuroscience, University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado. Electronic address: Guido.Frank@ucdenver.edu. 2. Department of Psychology, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado. 3. Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Denver, The Children's Hospital, Aurora, Colorado. 4. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The neurobiology of bulimia nervosa (BN) is poorly understood. Recent animal literature suggests that binge eating is associated with altered brain dopamine (DA) reward function. In this study, we wanted to investigate DA-related brain reward learning in BN. METHODS: Ill BN (n = 20, age: mean = 25.2, SD = 5.3 years) and healthy control women (CW) (n = 23, age: mean = 27.2, SD = 6.4 years) underwent functional magnetic resonance brain imaging together with application of a DA-related reward learning paradigm, the temporal difference (TD) model. That task involves association learning between conditioned visual and unconditioned taste stimuli, as well as unexpected violation of those learned associations. Study participants also completed the Sensitivity to Reward and Punishment Questionnaire. RESULTS: Bulimia nervosa individuals showed reduced brain response compared with CW for unexpected receipt and omission of taste stimuli, as well as reduced brain regression response to the TD computer model generated reward values, in insula, ventral putamen, amygdala, and orbitofrontal cortex. Those results were qualitatively similar in BN individuals who were nondepressed and unmedicated. Binge/purge frequency in BN inversely predicted reduced TD model response. Bulimia nervosa individuals showed significantly higher Sensitivity to Reward and Punishment compared with CW. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study that relates reduced brain DA responses in BN to the altered learning of associations between arbitrary visual stimuli and taste rewards. This attenuated response is related to frequency of binge/purge episodes in BN. The brain DA neurotransmitter system could be an important treatment target for BN.
BACKGROUND: The neurobiology of bulimia nervosa (BN) is poorly understood. Recent animal literature suggests that binge eating is associated with altered brain dopamine (DA) reward function. In this study, we wanted to investigate DA-related brain reward learning in BN. METHODS: Ill BN (n = 20, age: mean = 25.2, SD = 5.3 years) and healthy control women (CW) (n = 23, age: mean = 27.2, SD = 6.4 years) underwent functional magnetic resonance brain imaging together with application of a DA-related reward learning paradigm, the temporal difference (TD) model. That task involves association learning between conditioned visual and unconditioned taste stimuli, as well as unexpected violation of those learned associations. Study participants also completed the Sensitivity to Reward and Punishment Questionnaire. RESULTS:Bulimia nervosa individuals showed reduced brain response compared with CW for unexpected receipt and omission of taste stimuli, as well as reduced brain regression response to the TD computer model generated reward values, in insula, ventral putamen, amygdala, and orbitofrontal cortex. Those results were qualitatively similar in BN individuals who were nondepressed and unmedicated. Binge/purge frequency in BN inversely predicted reduced TD model response. Bulimia nervosa individuals showed significantly higher Sensitivity to Reward and Punishment compared with CW. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study that relates reduced brain DA responses in BN to the altered learning of associations between arbitrary visual stimuli and taste rewards. This attenuated response is related to frequency of binge/purge episodes in BN. The brain DA neurotransmitter system could be an important treatment target for BN.
Authors: W H Kaye; J C Ballenger; R B Lydiard; G W Stuart; M T Laraia; P O'Neil; M D Fossey; V Stevens; S Lesser; G Hsu Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 1990-02 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Kenneth J Thiel; Jennifer M Wenzel; Nathan S Pentkowski; Rebecca J Hobbs; Andrea T Alleweireldt; Janet L Neisewander Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2010-06-19 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Guido K Frank; Walter H Kaye; Cameron S Carter; Sarah Brooks; Christopher May; Kate Fissell; V Andrew Stenger Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2003-12-30 Impact factor: 2.390
Authors: Laura A Berner; Tiffany A Brown; Jason M Lavender; Emily Lopez; Christina E Wierenga; Walter H Kaye Journal: Mol Cell Endocrinol Date: 2018-11-02 Impact factor: 4.102
Authors: Henry W Chase; Poornima Kumar; Simon B Eickhoff; Alexandre Y Dombrovski Journal: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: Walter H Kaye; Christina E Wierenga; Ursula F Bailer; Alan N Simmons; Angela Wagner; Amanda Bischoff-Grethe Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2013-02-04 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Aviva K Olsavsky; Megan E Shott; Marisa C DeGuzman; Guido K W Frank Journal: Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging Date: 2018-08-18 Impact factor: 2.376