Literature DB >> 21718963

Office task effects on comfort and body dynamics in five dynamic office chairs.

Liesbeth Groenesteijn1, Rolf P Ellegast, Kathrin Keller, Frank Krause, Helmut Berger, Michiel P de Looze.   

Abstract

In the present study, we investigated the effect of office tasks on posture and movements in field settings, and the comfort rating for chair characteristics and correlation with type of task. The tasks studied were: computer work, telephoning, desk work and conversation. Postures, movements, chair part inclinations and comfort rating data were collected from 12 subjects. Computer work showed the lowest physical activity, together with upright trunk and head position and low backrest inclination. Conversation shows the highest activity of head legs and low back together with the highest cervical spine extension. In contrast, desk work provoked the most cervical spine flexion and showed the second lowest activity. The telephoning tasks showed medium activity and the highest kyphosis. Conversation showed the highest backrest inclination. Positive comfort relations were found for computer work and a "swing system" chair, for telephoning and an active longitudinal seat rotation, and for desk work and a chair with a three-dimensionally moveable seat. Crown
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21718963     DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  9 in total

1.  Kinematic posture analysis of orthodontists in their daily working practice.

Authors:  I Hauck; C Erbe; J Nowak; I Hermanns; D Ditchen; R Ellegast; G Oremek; D A Groneberg; D Ohlendorf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Physiological Motion Axis for the Seat of a Dynamic Office Chair.

Authors:  Roman Peter Kuster; Christoph Markus Bauer; Sarah Oetiker; Jan Kool
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 2.888

3.  Motion analysis in the field of dentistry: a kinematic comparison of dentists and orthodontists.

Authors:  J Nowak; C Erbe; I Hauck; D A Groneberg; I Hermanns; R Ellegast; D Ditchen; D Ohlendorf
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Is active sitting on a dynamic office chair controlled by the trunk muscles?

Authors:  Roman Peter Kuster; Christoph Michael Bauer; Daniel Baumgartner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A kinematic posture analysis of neurological assistants in their daily working practice-a pilot study.

Authors:  Bijanzadeh Anne; Hermanns Ingo; Ellegast Rolf; Laura Fraeulin; Holzgreve Fabian; Stefanie Mache; David A Groneberg; Ohlendorf Daniela
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 2.646

6.  Human behaviour should be recorded in (dis)comfort research.

Authors:  M Smulders; P Vink
Journal:  Work       Date:  2021

7.  Spinal cord injury and pressure ulcer prevention: using functional activity in pressure relief.

Authors:  May Stinson; Rachel Schofield; Cathy Gillan; Julie Morton; Evie Gardner; Stephen Sprigle; Alison Porter-Armstrong
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2013-04-09

8.  Kinematic analysis of work-related musculoskeletal loading of trunk among dentists in Germany.

Authors:  Daniela Ohlendorf; Christina Erbe; Imke Hauck; Jennifer Nowak; Ingo Hermanns; Dirk Ditchen; Rolf Ellegast; David A Groneberg
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Constrained posture in dentistry - a kinematic analysis of dentists.

Authors:  Daniela Ohlendorf; Christina Erbe; Jennifer Nowak; Imke Hauck; Ingo Hermanns; Dirk Ditchen; Rolf Ellegast; David A Groneberg
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 2.362

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.