| Literature DB >> 21718545 |
Rubik J Sommerhalder1, Bruce A McDonald, Fabio Mascher, Jiasui Zhan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Monoculture, multi-cropping and wider use of highly resistant cultivars have been proposed as mechanisms to explain the elevated rate of evolution of plant pathogens in agricultural ecosystems. We used a mark-release-recapture experiment with the wheat pathogen Phaeosphaeria nodorum to evaluate the impact of two of these mechanisms on the evolution of a pathogen population. Nine P. nodorum isolates marked with ten microsatellite markers and one minisatellite were released onto five replicated host populations to initiate epidemics of Stagonospora nodorum leaf blotch. The experiment was carried out over two consecutive host growing seasons and two pathogen collections were made during each season.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21718545 PMCID: PMC3145600 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-188
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Figure 1Schematic of experimental design illustrating inoculation and sampling procedures used over the course of the 2-year field experiment conducted in Switzerland during the 2003-2004 and 2004-2005 winter wheat growing seasons.
Figure 2Life cycle of .
Figure 3Frequencies and their 95% confidence intervals of nine . Only the last part of each isolate name (See Table 1 for full names) is shown in the figure. A) Levis; B) Runal; C) 1:1 Mixture of Runal and Tamaro; D) Tamaro and E) Tirone.
Pair-wise comparisons for differences in genotype frequencies between Phaeosphaeria nodorum collections made from different hosts in 2004 based on a contingency χ2 test.
| Levis | Runal | Mixture | Tamaro | Tirone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Levis | --- | 10.24 (7) | 7.43 (6) | 14.06 (8) | 9.07 (8) |
| Runal | 12.66 (7) | --- | 5.53 (7) | 7.38 (8) | 8.41 (8) |
| Mixture | 5.42 (7) | 9.29 (7) | --- | 6.69 (8) | 11.37 (8) |
| Tamaro | 7.32 (7) | 13.39 (7) | 4.86 (7) | --- | 14.98 (8) |
| Tirone | 7.68 (8) | 14.59 (8) | 16.33 (8) | --- |
Above the diagonal are comparisons between populations sampled in early 2004 (2004A) and below the diagonal are comparisons between populations made in late 2004 (2004B). Values in bold font are significant after Bonferroni correction at a global alpha of 0.05 (p-value of 0.05/10 = 0.005) and values in parenthesis are degrees of freedom.
* Significant at p = 0.05 before Bonferroni correction
** Significant at p = 0.01 before Bonferroni correction
Pair-wise comparisons for differences in genotype frequencies between Phaeosphaeria nodorum collections made from different hosts in 2005A based on a contingency χ2 test.
| Runal | Mixture | Tamaro | Tirone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Levis | 10.81 (6) | 5.64 (4) | 12.03 (5)* | |
| Runal | 1.92 (5) | 8.32 (6) | 3.98 (7) | |
| Mixture | 7.8 (5) | 3.9 (6) | ||
| Tamaro | 4.76 (6) |
Values in bold font are significant after Bonferroni correction at a global alpha of 0.0001 (p-value of 0.0001/10 = 0.00001) and values in parenthesis are degrees of freedom.
* Significant at p = 0.05 before Bonferroni correction
**** Significant at p < 0.0001 before Bonferroni correction
χ2 tests for difference in genotype frequencies among Phaeosphaeria nodorum populations sampled from different hosts at the same point in time.
| Collection | |
|---|---|
| 2004A | 37.99 (32) |
| 2004B | 46.12 (32)* |
| 2005A | |
| 2005B |
Values in bold font are significant after Bonferroni correction at a global alpha of 0.05 (p-value of 0.05/4 = 0.0125) and values in parenthesis are degrees of freedom.
* Significant at p = 0.05 before Bonferroni correction
** Significant at p = 0.01 before Bonferroni correction
Contingency χ2 tests for differences in genotype frequencies between Phaeosphaeria nodorum collections made from the same host treatment at different sampling times.
| Pair-wise comparisons | Multi-population comparisons | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004A vs. 2004B | 2004B vs. 2005A | 2004A vs. 2005A | ||
| Levis | 10.16 (7) | 17.50 (7) ** | 32.37 (16) ** | |
| Runal | 16.28 (7)* | 10.82 (6) | 11.82 (7) | 24.95 (14)* |
| Mixture | 10.87 (7) | 10.97 (8) | 10.38 (6) | 18.26 (16) |
| Tamaro | 17.80 (8)* | 17.25 (7)** | 15.87 (8) * | 30. 13 (16)* |
| Tirone | 15.80 (8)* | 15.60 (8)* | 19.54 (8) ** | 31.64 (16) ** |
Values in bold font are significant after Bonferroni correction at a global alpha of 0.05 (p-value of 0.05/15 = 0.0032) and values in parenthesis are degrees of freedom. A Bonferroni correction was not applied for the multi-population analysis.
* Significant at p = 0.05 before Bonferroni correction
** Significant at p = 0.01 before Bonferroni correction
*** Significant at p = 0.001 before Bonferroni correction
Contingency χ2 tests for differences in genotype frequencies between Phaeosphaeria nodorum collections sampled at different times.
| 2004B | 2005A | 2005B | |
|---|---|---|---|
| - | |||
| - |
Values in bold font are significant after Bonferroni correction at a global alpha of 0.05 (p-value of 0.05/6 = 0.0083) and values in parenthesis are degrees of freedom.
** Significant at p = 0.01 before Bonferroni correction
**** Significant at p < 0.0001 before Bonferroni correction
Average selection coefficients and their standard deviations (in parentheses) for five released pathogen strains on each host treatment.
| Levis | Runal | Mixture | Tamaro | Tirone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SN99CH2.04a | 0.51 (0.08) a | 0.03 (0.03) a | 0.34 (0.13) a | 0.15 (0.14) c | 0.42 (0.09) b |
| SN99CH2.09a | 0.48 (0.10) a | 0.59 (0.09) b | 0.44 (0.15) a | 0.03 (0.03) c | 0.82 (0.07) a |
| SN99CH2.12a | 0.27 (0.10) b | 0.37 (0.11) c | 0.43 (0.15) a | 0.52 (0.05) b | 0.32 (0.10) c |
| SN99CH3.20a | 0.30 (0.11) b | 0.80 (0.06) a | 0.40 (0.16) a | 0.71 (0.28) a | 0.29 (0.09) c |
| C1 | 0.29 (0.12) b | 0.83 (0.05) a | 0.43 (0.14) a | 0.67 (0.06) a | 0.05 (0.04) b |
Different letters following mean values in the same column indicate that selection coefficients differ significantly at P = 0.05.
Analysis of variance for selection coefficients of the five most frequent inoculated strains of Phaeosphaeria nodorum.
| Source | df | F-ratio | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cultivar | 4 | 15.56 | 0.0001 |
| Isolate | 4 | 130.28 | 0.0001 |
| Cultivar * Isolate | 12 | 145.87 | 0.0001 |