AIMS: The aim of this investigation was to establish the degree of correlation between measurements from culture-dependent microbiological techniques and from next generation sequencing technologies. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data generated by both techniques were collected from faecal samples from 185 elderly Irish people involved in the ongoing ELDERMET study (http://eldermet.ucc.ie). The results for three groups of intestinal bacteria were compared. Bifidobacterium sp., Lactobacillus sp. and Enterobacteriaceae were enumerated on selective media through culture-dependent techniques, whereas proportions of these bacteria were determined through sequencing technology against the background of other bacteria. The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient determined a good correlation between results from culture-dependent microbiology and culture-independent techniques for all three bacterial groups assessed (correlation coefficients for Bifidobacterium sp., Lactobacillus sp. and Enterobacteriaceae were 0·380, 0·366 and 0·437, respectively). CONCLUSION: Correlation between the two methods implies that a single method is capable of profiling intestinal Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus and Enterobacteriaceae populations. However, both methods have advantages that justify their use in tandem. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This is the first extensive study to compare bacterial counts from culture-dependent microbiological techniques and from next generation sequencing technologies.
AIMS: The aim of this investigation was to establish the degree of correlation between measurements from culture-dependent microbiological techniques and from next generation sequencing technologies. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data generated by both techniques were collected from faecal samples from 185 elderly Irish people involved in the ongoing ELDERMET study (http://eldermet.ucc.ie). The results for three groups of intestinal bacteria were compared. Bifidobacterium sp., Lactobacillus sp. and Enterobacteriaceae were enumerated on selective media through culture-dependent techniques, whereas proportions of these bacteria were determined through sequencing technology against the background of other bacteria. The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient determined a good correlation between results from culture-dependent microbiology and culture-independent techniques for all three bacterial groups assessed (correlation coefficients for Bifidobacterium sp., Lactobacillus sp. and Enterobacteriaceae were 0·380, 0·366 and 0·437, respectively). CONCLUSION: Correlation between the two methods implies that a single method is capable of profiling intestinal Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus and Enterobacteriaceae populations. However, both methods have advantages that justify their use in tandem. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This is the first extensive study to compare bacterial counts from culture-dependent microbiological techniques and from next generation sequencing technologies.
Authors: Mary C Rea; Orla O'Sullivan; Fergus Shanahan; Paul W O'Toole; Catherine Stanton; R Paul Ross; Colin Hill Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2011-12-07 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Ciara A Carberry; Sinéad M Waters; Sinead M Waters; David A Kenny; Christopher J Creevey Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2013-11-08 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Jonathan R Swann; Konstantina Spagou; Matthew Lewis; Jeremy K Nicholson; Dana A Glei; Teresa E Seeman; Christopher L Coe; Noreen Goldman; Carol D Ryff; Maxine Weinstein; Elaine Holmes Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2013-06-24 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Fiona Fouhy; Caitriona M Guinane; Seamus Hussey; Rebecca Wall; C Anthony Ryan; Eugene M Dempsey; Brendan Murphy; R Paul Ross; Gerald F Fitzgerald; Catherine Stanton; Paul D Cotter Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2012-09-04 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Amandine Everard; Vladimir Lazarevic; Muriel Derrien; Myriam Girard; Giulio G Muccioli; Giulio M Muccioli; Audrey M Neyrinck; Sam Possemiers; Ann Van Holle; Patrice François; Willem M de Vos; Nathalie M Delzenne; Jacques Schrenzel; Patrice D Cani Journal: Diabetes Date: 2011-09-20 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Fiona Fouhy; Jennifer Deane; Mary C Rea; Órla O'Sullivan; R Paul Ross; Grace O'Callaghan; Barry J Plant; Catherine Stanton Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-03-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Caitriona M Guinane; Amany Tadrous; Fiona Fouhy; C Anthony Ryan; Eugene M Dempsey; Brendan Murphy; Emmet Andrews; Paul D Cotter; Catherine Stanton; R Paul Ross Journal: MBio Date: 2013-01-15 Impact factor: 7.867
Authors: Eoin Barrett; Caitriona M Guinane; C Anthony Ryan; Eugene M Dempsey; Brendan P Murphy; Paul W O'Toole; Gerald F Fitzgerald; Paul D Cotter; R Paul Ross; Catherine Stanton Journal: Microbiologyopen Date: 2013-01-24 Impact factor: 3.139
Authors: Catherine A Lozupone; Jesse Stombaugh; Antonio Gonzalez; Gail Ackermann; Doug Wendel; Yoshiki Vázquez-Baeza; Janet K Jansson; Jeffrey I Gordon; Rob Knight Journal: Genome Res Date: 2013-07-16 Impact factor: 9.043