Literature DB >> 21718265

Sustained economic benefits of resistance training in community-dwelling senior women.

Jennifer C Davis1, Carlo A Marra, M Clare Robertson, Mehdi Najafzadeh, Teresa Liu-Ambrose.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: To determine whether the health and cost benefits of resistance training were sustained 12 months after formal cessation of the intervention.
DESIGN: Cost-utility analysis conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: Community-dwelling women aged 65 to 75 living in Vancouver, British Columbia. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred twenty-three of the 155 community-dwelling women aged 65 to 75 years who originally were randomly allocated to once-weekly resistance training (n=54), twice-weekly resistance training (n=52), or twice-weekly balance and tone exercises (control group; n=49) participated in the 12-month follow-up study. Of these, 98 took part in the economic evaluation (twice-weekly balance and tone exercises, n=28; once-weekly resistance training, n=35; twice-weekly resistance training, n=35). MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome measure was incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Healthcare resource utilization was assessed over 21 months (2009 prices); health status was assessed using the EuroQol-5D to calculate QALYs using a 21-month time horizon.
RESULTS: Once- and twice-weekly resistance training were less costly than balance and tone classes, with incremental mean healthcare costs of Canadian dollars (CAD$)1,857 and CAD$1,077, respectively. The incremental QALYs for once- and twice-weekly resistance training were -0.051 and -0.081, respectively, compared with balance and tone exercises.
CONCLUSION: The cost benefits of participating in a 12-month resistance training intervention were sustained for the once- and twice-weekly resistance training group, whereas the health benefits were not.
© 2011, Copyright the Authors. Journal compilation © 2011, The American Geriatrics Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21718265      PMCID: PMC4019577          DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03474.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  18 in total

1.  Handling uncertainty when performing economic evaluation of healthcare interventions.

Authors:  A H Briggs; A M Gray
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Burden of disease and priority setting.

Authors:  G Mooney; V Wiseman
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Representing uncertainty: the role of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves.

Authors:  E Fenwick; K Claxton; M Sculpher
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Burden of illness estimates for priority setting: a debate revisited.

Authors:  V Wiseman; G Mooney
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Handling missing data in patient-level cost-effectiveness analysis alongside randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  Andrea Manca; Stephen Palmer
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.561

6.  Otago home-based strength and balance retraining improves executive functioning in older fallers: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Teresa Liu-Ambrose; Meghan G Donaldson; Yasmin Ahamed; Peter Graf; Wendy L Cook; Jacqueline Close; Stephen R Lord; Karim M Khan
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Challenges moving forward with economic evaluations of exercise intervention strategies aimed at combating cognitive impairment and dementia.

Authors:  Jennifer C Davis; Ging-Yuek R Hsiung; Teresa Liu-Ambrose
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 13.800

8.  Economic evaluation of dose-response resistance training in older women: a cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis.

Authors:  J C Davis; C A Marra; M C Robertson; K M Khan; M Najafzadeh; M C Ashe; T Liu-Ambrose
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  The impact of resistance exercise on the cognitive function of the elderly.

Authors:  Ricardo C Cassilhas; Valter A R Viana; Viviane Grassmann; Ronaldo T Santos; Ruth F Santos; Sérgio Tufik; Marco T Mello
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Effects of aerobic exercise on mild cognitive impairment: a controlled trial.

Authors:  Laura D Baker; Laura L Frank; Karen Foster-Schubert; Pattie S Green; Charles W Wilkinson; Anne McTiernan; Stephen R Plymate; Mark A Fishel; G Stennis Watson; Brenna A Cholerton; Glen E Duncan; Pankaj D Mehta; Suzanne Craft
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2010-01
View more
  5 in total

1.  International depiction of the cost of functional independence limitations among older adults living in the community: a systematic review and cost-of-impairment study.

Authors:  Ryan S Falck; Alexis G Percival; Daria Tai; Jennifer C Davis
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-10-22       Impact factor: 4.070

Review 2.  Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community.

Authors:  Lesley D Gillespie; M Clare Robertson; William J Gillespie; Catherine Sherrington; Simon Gates; Lindy M Clemson; Sarah E Lamb
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-09-12

3.  An economic evaluation of resistance training and aerobic training versus balance and toning exercises in older adults with mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Jennifer C Davis; Stirling Bryan; Carlo A Marra; Devika Sharma; Alison Chan; B Lynn Beattie; Peter Graf; Teresa Liu-Ambrose
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Exercise for preventing falls in older people living in the community.

Authors:  Catherine Sherrington; Nicola J Fairhall; Geraldine K Wallbank; Anne Tiedemann; Zoe A Michaleff; Kirsten Howard; Lindy Clemson; Sally Hopewell; Sarah E Lamb
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-01-31

5.  Strengthening the Brain-Is Resistance Training with Blood Flow Restriction an Effective Strategy for Cognitive Improvement?

Authors:  Alexander Törpel; Fabian Herold; Dennis Hamacher; Notger G Müller; Lutz Schega
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 4.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.