Organisation and management of public dentistry in Sweden. Past, present and future.

UNLABELLED: Professional organisations present challenges in management compared to producing companies, as control of the work lies within the professional groups themselves. Management in the Public Dental Health Service (PDHS) has an added difficulty in the two-tiered political governance in Swedish public dentistry. The aim of this thesis was to contribute to better understanding of the organisation and management of Human Service Organisations, especially the PDHS in Sweden, thereby contributing to long-term sustainability with due regard to the professionals. The aim was also to point to some future difficulties facing the PDHS and possible solutions to these. Four papers are included in the thesis. The first paper set out to define the professions in dentistry in Sweden from theories on professions. Dentists and, to a lesser degree; dental hygienists were the identified professional groups. The second paper scrutinised the external environment for dentistry in Sweden in the form of political decisions, i.e., laws and regulations. The findings were that there can be a gap between the formal objectives and the factual behaviour from the political level, and that certain politically attractive ideas might reoccur at a later time despite good scientific arguments against them. Also indicated in this paper were ways to influence the political processes, by active participation in the early stages of decision-making The third paper dealt with the heads (CDOs) of the PDHS in the counties and is based on a questionnaire to them on management. It was found that ideas on management and organisation usually were embedded in the way the respective county council was organised. A strong belief in advantages of scale was noted, both for administration and also for dental care itself. The fourth paper compared overall job satisfaction among publicly employed dentists in Denmark and Sweden. A focus on size of clinic, on professional development and on influence at the work place was found to be important. The Danish dentists were generally more satisfied with their overall job situations than the Swedish ones. One explanation might be found in the environment for the respective service, with a much stronger element of competition in Sweden. Another aspect could be that the expectations of the Danish dentists might be more realistic when they entered the public service. In an appendix the history of the Swedish Public Dental Health Service is outlined.
CONCLUSIONS: Dentists in Sweden are an established profession and dental hygienists are an emerging profession; they and society would benefit from a clearer delineation and definition of their unique competences. Political decision-making is not necessarily rational, and garbage can models or similar can give a better understanding of political processes. CDOs have a widespread belief in advantages of scale in administration as well as in care, which may pose future problems for the provision of dental care in sparsely populated areas. Overall job satisfaction, as part of Good Work, is founded in an atmosphere at the clinic that is focussed on professional values. It is noteworthy that PDHS dentists not born in Sweden had a lower job satisfaction than those born in Sweden. Perhaps a closer cooperation between the dental colleges and the PDHS might give the newly qualified dentists a more realistic view of the professional challenges in public dentistry, as well as giving the colleges access to the vast material on patients in the PDHS. The future division of tasks between the general dentists, dental hygienists and specialist care dentists has a great impact on the future need for personnel, and needs to be carefully analysed. The future diminishing numbers of dentists and the difficulty for the PDHS to retain dentists may be met by adapting the organisations to a much greater flexibility by allowing different teams to organise their own work. The possibilities to give the patients good service quality will depend on continued democratisation and less managerial control. Producer cooperatives, franchising, or similar, could be revisited and tried. However, such forms will require carefully designed contracts where the objectives and the outcomes are possible to define and to evaluate. The balance between good work for dentists, an efficient organisation and perceived good service to the public will be objects for further studies.