Literature DB >> 21717482

Risks, trust and knowledge: determinants of pregnant women's decisions regarding participation in a future Q fever screening and treatment program during a large epidemic in The Netherlands.

Janna Klein Breteler1, Jurriaan P Oudhoff, Janna M Munster, Jan G Aarnoudse, Jim E van Steenbergen, Desirée J M A Beaujean.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Contracting Q fever during pregnancy carries a risk of developing obstetric complications. The aim of this study was to gain insight into pregnant women's decisions regarding participation in a future Q fever screening and treatment program.
METHODS: Pregnant women (N = 148) in Q fever high-risk areas in The Netherlands were recruited via midwives' practices and via an online panel for a cross-sectional questionnaire survey. The outcome measures included intention to participate in the program, Q fever exposure risk, perceived Q fever risk, trust in health professionals and authorities, disease-related knowledge and additional outcome measures.
RESULTS: Fifty-six percent of the respondents intended to participate in the screening and treatment program. The sole determinant of a higher intended program uptake was a more positive appraisal of program efficacy and convenience. This appraisal was in turn associated with perceived risk and knowledge.
CONCLUSION: Women's appraisal of program efficacy and convenience, their disease-related knowledge and perceived Q fever risk seem to be crucial for their intended program uptake. A successful implementation of a Q fever screening and treatment program may thus depend on the benefits and downsides of the program, and on securing that women are aware of the risks of the disease.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21717482     DOI: 10.1002/pd.2772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  2 in total

1.  Maternofetal consequences of Coxiella burnetii infection in pregnancy: a case series of two outbreaks.

Authors:  Katharina Boden; Andreas Brueckmann; Christiane Wagner-Wiening; Beate Hermann; Klaus Henning; Thomas Junghanss; Thomas Seidel; Michael Baier; Eberhard Straube; Dirk Theegarten
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.090

2.  Q fever in the Netherlands: public perceptions and behavioral responses in three different epidemiological regions: a follow-up study.

Authors:  Marloes Bults; Desirée Beaujean; Clementine Wijkmans; Jan Hendrik Richardus; Hélène Voeten
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.295

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.