Literature DB >> 21717283

Postoperative impedance-pH testing is unreliable after Nissen fundoplication with or without giant hiatal hernia repair.

Brittany N Arnold1, Christy M Dunst, Angi B Gill, Trudie A Goers, Lee L Swanström.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Combined 24-h multichannel intralumenal impedance-pH monitoring (MII-pH) is gaining popularity as a diagnostic tool for gastroesophageal reflux. Since the surgical reduction of hiatal hernias and creation of a fundoplication anatomically restores the gastroesophageal reflux barrier, one would assume that it effectively stops all reflux regardless of composition. Our aim is to evaluate the results of routine MII-pH testing in successful Nissen fundoplication patients.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-two patients with normal acid exposure, confirmed by 24-h pH testing, after Nissen fundoplication were evaluated with symptomatic questionnaire, esophageal manometry and MII-pH testing more than 6 months after surgery. Patients were grouped into normal and abnormal based on postoperative impedance results. Patients with Nissen alone were separately compared to patients with Nissen + giant hiatal hernia (GHH).
RESULTS: Twenty-nine (47%) patients exhibited abnormal impedance after successful Nissen fundoplication. Abnormal impedance was associated with GHH repair, lower bolus pressures, and lower distal esophageal contraction amplitudes.
CONCLUSION: Postoperative testing with the standard MII-pH catheters using published normative values seems to be clinically irrelevant. Clinicians should analyze the results of routine MII-pH testing in the setting of a fundoplication critically as the current technology is associated with a high false positive rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21717283     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-011-1597-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  14 in total

1.  A randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic nissen fundoplication versus proton pump inhibitors for treatment of patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease: One-year follow-up.

Authors:  Mehran Anvari; Christopher Allen; John Marshall; David Armstrong; Ron Goeree; Wendy Ungar; Charles Goldsmith
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.058

2.  Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring of the distal esophagus. A quantitative measure of gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  L F Johnson; T R Demeester
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring to select patients with persistent gastro-oesophageal reflux for laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  I Mainie; R Tutuian; A Agrawal; D Adams; D O Castell
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Continued (5-year) followup of a randomized clinical study comparing antireflux surgery and omeprazole in gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  L Lundell; P Miettinen; H E Myrvold; S A Pedersen; B Liedman; J G Hatlebakk; R Julkonen; K Levander; J Carlsson; M Lamm; I Wiklund
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 5.  Effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors in nonerosive reflux disease.

Authors:  Bonnie B Dean; Anacleto D Gano; Kevin Knight; Joshua J Ofman; Ronnie Fass
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 11.382

6.  Comparison of medical and surgical therapy for complicated gastroesophageal reflux disease in veterans. The Department of Veterans Affairs Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Study Group.

Authors:  S J Spechler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-03-19       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Prospective study examining the impact of multichannel intraluminal impedance on antireflux surgery.

Authors:  C Gruebel; G Linke; R Tutuian; G Hebbard; A Zerz; C Meyenberger; J Borovicka
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease: esophageal impedance to progress?

Authors:  Stuart Jon Spechler
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Postoperative symptoms and failure after antireflux surgery.

Authors:  Yashodhan S Khajanchee; Robert W O'Rourke; Barbara Lockhart; Emma J Patterson; Paul D Hansen; Lee L Swanstrom
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2002-09

10.  Asthmatics with gastroesophageal reflux: long term results of a randomized trial of medical and surgical antireflux therapies.

Authors:  Stephen J Sontag; Susan O'Connell; Sharad Khandelwal; Herbert Greenlee; Thomas Schnell; Bernard Nemchausky; Gregorio Chejfec; Todd Miller; Jean Seidel; Amnon Sonnenberg
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  4 in total

1.  Variability in endoscopic assessment of Nissen fundoplication wrap integrity and hiatus herniation.

Authors:  Erin J Song; Rena Yadlapati; Joan W Chen; Alice Parish; Matthew J Whitson; Karthik Ravi; Amit Patel; Dustin A Carlson; Abraham Khan; Donna Niedzwiecki; David A Leiman
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 2.822

2.  Gastrointestinal Dysmotility and the Implications for Respiratory Disease.

Authors:  Lusine Ambartsumyan; Samuel Nurko; Rachel Rosen
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Pediatr       Date:  2019-04-26

3.  Critical analysis of esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance monitoring 20 years later.

Authors:  Fernando A M Herbella
Journal:  ISRN Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-24

Review 4.  Advances in the Diagnosis of GERD Using the Esophageal pH Monitoring, Gastro-Esophageal Impedance-pH Monitoring, And Pitfalls.

Authors:  Mojgan Forootan; Homayoun Zojaji; Mohammad Javad Ehsani; Mohammad Darvishi
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2018-10-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.