Literature DB >> 21717138

Is saliva suitable as a biological fluid in relative bioavailability studies? Analysis of its performance in a 4 x 2 replicate crossover design.

M Esperanza Ruiz1, Pietro Fagiolino, Perla M de Buschiazzo, M Guillermina Volonté.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the suitability of saliva as a biological fluid in relative bioavailability (RBA) studies, with the focus on the statistical design and data variability. A randomized, open-label, four periods and two sequences (4 × 2) crossover RBA study in saliva of two phenytoin (PHT) 100 mg immediate-release capsules was performed. PHT is a narrow therapeutic index drug that has been widely used for epilepsy treatment for many years. Published information regarding its bioavailability is available, but plasma assessed. This study was designed and performed using saliva as the biological fluid and the simplest conditions that produce coherent results with previously published plasma studies. Pharmacokinetic parameters (C (max), T (max), AUC(0-t ), AUC(0-inf), C (max)/AUC(0-t ), K (e), and t (1/2)) for each volunteer at each period were calculated. Four different BE calculations were performed: individual bioequivalence, by the method of moments, and three average bioequivalence with data averaged over the two administrations and with data of periods 1-2 and 3-4. ANOVA calculation showed no significant subject-by-formulation interaction, period and sequence effects. The intra-subject variabilities were at least 20-fold lower than the inter-subject ones for C (max), AUC(0-t ) and AUC(0-inf). In all four BE calculations, the 90% CIs for the T/R ratios of studied pharmacokinetics parameters fell within the 80-125% range proposed by most regulatory agencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21717138     DOI: 10.1007/s13318-011-0051-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0378-7966            Impact factor:   2.441


  17 in total

1.  Who needs individual bioequivalence studies for narrow therapeutic index drugs? A case for warfarin.

Authors:  A Yacobi; E Masson; D Moros; D Ganes; C Lapointe; Z Abolfathi; M LeBel; Y Golander; D Doepner; T Blumberg; Y Cohen; B Levitt
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.126

Review 2.  Therapeutic drug monitoring in saliva. An update.

Authors:  R K Drobitch; C K Svensson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  The use of saliva as a biological fluid in relative bioavailability studies: comparison and correlation with plasma results.

Authors:  M Esperanza Ruiz; Paula Conforti; Pietro Fagiolino; M Guillermina Volonté
Journal:  Biopharm Drug Dispos       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 1.627

4.  Towards a practical strategy for assessing individual bioequivalence. Food and Drug Administration Individual Bioequivalence Working Group.

Authors:  R Schall; R L Williams
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1996-02

5.  The transitivity of bioequivalence testing: potential for drift.

Authors:  S Anderson; W W Hauck
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.366

Review 6.  Recommendations for bioequivalence testing of cyclosporine generics revisited.

Authors:  U Christians; M R First; L Z Benet
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.681

7.  Bioavailability of 11 phenytoin products.

Authors:  A P Melikian; A B Straughn; G W Slywka; P L Whyatt; M C Meyer
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1977-04

8.  Bioequivalence and narrow therapeutic index drugs.

Authors:  L Z Benet; J E Goyan
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.705

Review 9.  Monitoring of drug concentrations in saliva: a non-invasive pharmacokinetic procedure.

Authors:  W A Ritschel; G A Tompson
Journal:  Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1983-10

10.  Saliva-plasma drug concentration ratios during absorption: theoretical considerations and pharmacokinetic implications.

Authors:  J Posti
Journal:  Pharm Acta Helv       Date:  1982
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.