| Literature DB >> 21716686 |
Toshiaki Furuta1, Michihiko Sone, Yasushi Fujimoto, Shunjiro Yagi, Makoto Sugiura, Yuzuru Kamei, Hitoshi Fujii, Tsutomu Nakashima.
Abstract
Objective. We investigated the efficiency of laser speckle flowgraphy for evaluating blood flow in free flaps used for plastic surgery. Methods. We measured blood flow using a visual laser meter capable of providing two-dimensional color graphic representations of flow distribution for a given area using a dynamic laser speckle effect. Using laser speckle flowgraphy, we examined the blood flow of 20 free flaps applied following the excision of head and neck tumors. Results. After anastomosis of the feeding and draining blood vessels and sewing the flap, musculocutaneous (MC) flaps showed significantly lower blood flow than jejunal or omental flaps (P < .05). The ratio of blood flow decrease from the edge to the center was significantly greater in MC flaps than in jejunal or omental flaps (P < .001). Conclusion. Laser speckle flowgraphy is useful for the perioperative measurement of blood flow in free flaps used in plastic surgery. This method is a highly useful, practical, and reliable tool for assessing cutaneous blood flow and is expected to be applicable to several clinical fields.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21716686 PMCID: PMC3118536 DOI: 10.1155/2011/297251
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Otolaryngol ISSN: 1687-9201
The number of parts of cancer and kinds of flap.
| Patient | Gender (female/male) | Ages | Primary sites | Flap | Radiation therapy (gray) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M | 58 | Oropharynx | MC Flap | — |
| 2 | M | 64 | Oropharynx | MC Flap | 70 |
| 3 | M | 83 | Oropharynx | MC Flap | — |
| 4 | M | 84 | Tongue | MC Flap | — |
| 5 | F | 49 | Tongue | MC Flap | — |
| 6 | F | 48 | Tongue | MC Flap | — |
| 7 | F | 72 | Tongue | MC Flap | 30 |
| 8 | M | 60 | Larynx | MC Flap | — |
| 9 | M | 17 | Nose/paranasal sinuses | MC Flap | — |
| 10 | F | 72 | Tongue | Mc Flap | — |
| 11 | F | 54 | Hypopharynx | Jejunum | 40 |
| 12 | M | 59 | Hypopharynx | Jejunum | — |
| 13 | M | 76 | Hypopharynx | Jejunum | 60 |
| 14 | M | 54 | Hypopharynx | Jejunum | 64 |
| 15 | F | 50 | Hypopharynx | Jejunum | 40 |
| 16 | M | 67 | Hypopharynx | Jejunum | — |
| 17 | M | 70 | Hypopharynx | Jejunum | — |
| 18 | M | 70 | Parotid gland | Omental | — |
| 19 | M | 69 | Parotid gland | Omental | — |
| 20 | F | 28 | Nose/paranasal sinuses | Omental | — |
MC Flap: musculocutaneous flaps. M: male. F: female.
Figure 1Photograph of the laser flowgraphy system. The laser probe is attached to the tip of the arm. (A) Device for discharging the laser and the mirror. (B) CCD (Charge Coupled Device) image sensor. (C) Monitor screen. (D) Computer used.
Figure 2Schematic representation of visualization of two-dimensional blood flow distribution using laser speckle flowgraphy. (L1) Cylindrical lens. (M) Mirror. (L2) Lens 2.
Figure 3Photograph of measuring blood flow in the jejunal flap. (A) Device for discharging the laser and the mirror. (B) Jejunum. (C) Intubation tube.
Figure 4Laser flowgraphy in a case involving a musculocutaneous (MC) flap for treating a patient with tongue cancer.
Average derivative of edge and the flap center at the previous state of main nourishment vascular separation before and sewing the flap after.
| Patient | Flap | Center | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MC Flap | 167/184 (90.8) | 154/174 (88.5) |
| 2 | MC Flap | 149/172 (86.6) | 140/165 (84.8) |
| 3 | MC Flap | 139/163 (85.3) | 123/159 (77.4) |
| 4 | MC Flap | 173/176 (98.3) | 158/169 (93.5) |
| 5 | MC Flap | 162/177 (91.5) | 148/167 (88.6) |
| 6 | MC Flap | 167/171 (97.5) | 157/162 (96.9) |
| 7 | MC Flap | 138/168 (82.1) | 131/154 (85.1) |
| 8 | MC Flap | 165/207 (79.7) | 153/191 (80.1) |
| 9 | MC Flap | 185/194 (95.4) | 170/177 (96.0) |
| 10 | MC Flap | 170/173 (98.3) | 155/164 (94.5) |
| 11 | Jejunum | 78/80 (97.5) | 72/74 (97.3) |
| 12 | Jejunum | 88/90 (97.8) | 82/86 (95.3) |
| 13 | Jejunum | 81/86 (94.2) | 73/79 (92.4) |
| 14 | Jejunum | 53/55 (96.4) | 48/51 (94.1) |
| 15 | Jejunum | 71/72 (98.6) | 65/66 (98.5) |
| 16 | Jejunum | 72/73 (98.6) | 70/71 (98.6) |
| 17 | Jejunum | 78/82 (95.1) | 73/77 (94.8) |
| 18 | Omental | 151/152 (99.3) | 142/142 (100) |
| 19 | Omental | 157/159 (98.7) | 149/150 (99.3) |
| 20 | Omental | 157/159 (98.7) | 149/150 (97.3) |
After: after sewing and matching the flap. Before: before vascular separation. MC Flap: musculocutaneous flap.
Figure 5Blood flow ratios between the edge of flap to the flap center in a musculocutaneous (MC), jejunal and omental flaps, before vascular separation and after sewing the flaps.
Figure 6(a) Case that flow became bad when MC flap is collected. The MC flap on the other side was collected without the MC flap separating because the blood flow was bad. (b) State of flow on the second day of after the operation of the flap. The blood flow worsened and the edge of the flap got the sphacelation. The necrotic part of the flap is displayed blacking it.