| Literature DB >> 21716617 |
Gyeong Jo Byeon1, Kyung Hoon Kim.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rocker bottom shoes (RBS) are popular among patients with different foot, leg, or back problems in Korea. Patients with knee osteoarthritis concurrent weakness in the quadriceps femoris muscle, who wear these shoes, are often assumed to develop piriformis syndrome (PS). This study was performed to improve the understanding about the effect of wearing such shoes on duration of the syndrome in knee osteoarthritis.Entities:
Keywords: back pain; gait disorders; knee osteoarthritis; piriformis syndrome; shoes
Year: 2011 PMID: 21716617 PMCID: PMC3111566 DOI: 10.3344/kjp.2011.24.2.93
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Pain ISSN: 2005-9159
Fig. 1Piriformis injection under fluoroscope. (A) Anteroposterior view, (B) Lateral view.
Fig. 2A perform-at-home self-exercise program for piriformis muscle stretching. The exercise begins with a push- up position using hands and toes (A), followed by placing the affected leg across and underneath the body trunk so that, if possible, the affected knee is outside the trunk (B). The unaffected leg is extended straight back behind the trunk keeping the pelvis straight (C). The hips are moved backward toward the floor; the body is leant forward with the forearms toward the floor; the affected leg is kept in place, until a deep stretch is felt (D). The stretch is held for 30 s and then, the patient slowly returns to starting position.
Demographic Characteristics of Patients
The values are expressed mean ± standard deviation. S: stopped wearing rocker bottom shoes (RBS), K: keptwearing RBS, O: with knee osteoarthritis, N: without knee osteoarthritis, Wearing period: Duration of wearing RBS.
Fig. 3Changes in the positive flexion-adduction-internal rotation (FAIR) test ratios (A), the mean numeric rating scale (NRS) scores (B), and the mean revised Oswestry disability indices (ODIs) (%) (C), during the follow-up period in the 4 groups. *All variables were significantly higher in the KO group than in SN group (P < 0.05). †All variables were significantly higher in the KO group than in the SO group (P < 0.05).
Fig. 4Changes in the positive flexion-adduction-internal rotation (FAIR) test ratios (A), the mean numeric rating scale (NRS) scores (B), and mean revised Oswestry disability indices (ODIs) (%) (C), during the follow-up period in the S and K groups. No difference was observed in treatment effectiveness between N and O groups (D?F). *All variables were significantly higher in the K group than in the S group (P < 0.05).