Literature DB >> 21715674

Association between carbonyl sulfide uptake and (18)Δ during gas exchange in C(3) and C(4) leaves.

Keren Stimler1, Joseph A Berry, Steve A Montzka, Dan Yakir.   

Abstract

Carbonyl sulfide (COS) and C(18)OO exchange by leaves provide potentially powerful tracers of biosphere-atmosphere CO(2) exchange, and both are assumed to depend on carbonic anhydrase (CA) activity and conductance along the diffusive pathway in leaves. We investigated these links using C(3) and C(4) plants, hypothesizing that the rates of COS and C(18)OO exchange by leaves respond in parallel to environmental and biological drivers. Using CA-deficient antisense lines of C(4) and C(3) plants, COS uptake was essentially eliminated and discrimination against C(18)OO exchange ((18)Δ) greatly reduced, demonstrating CA's key role in both processes. (18)Δ showed a positive linear correlation with leaf relative uptake (LRU; ratio of COS to CO(2) assimilation rates, A(s)/A(c), normalized to their respective ambient concentrations), which reflected the effects of stomatal conductance on both COS and C(18)OO exchange. Unexpectedly, a decoupling between A(s) and (18)Δ was observed in comparing C(4) and C(3) plants, with a large decrease in (18)Δ but no parallel reduction in A(s) in the former. This could be explained by C(4) plants having higher COS concentrations at the CA site (maintaining high A(s) with reduced CA) and a high phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase/CA activity ratio (reducing (18)O exchange efficiency between CO(2) and water, but not A(s)). Similar A(s) but higher A(c) in C(4) versus C(3) plants resulted in lower LRU values in the former (1.16 ± 0.20 and 1.82 ± 0.18 for C(4) and C(3), respectively). LRU was, however, relatively constant in both plant types across a wide range of conditions, except low light (<191 μmol photon m(-2) s(-1)).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21715674      PMCID: PMC3165896          DOI: 10.1104/pp.111.176578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  14 in total

1.  Global enzymes: sphere of influence.

Authors:  Dan Yakir
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-04-25       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Relationships between carbonyl sulfide (COS) and CO2 during leaf gas exchange.

Authors:  Keren Stimler; Stephen A Montzka; Joseph A Berry; Yinon Rudich; Dan Yakir
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 10.151

3.  Nocturnal stomatal conductance effects on the delta(18)O signatures of foliage gas exchange observed in two forest ecosystems.

Authors:  U Seibt; L Wingate; J A Berry
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.196

4.  Association between tree-ring and needle delta13C and leaf gas exchange in Pinus halepensis under semi-arid conditions.

Authors:  Tamir Klein; Deborah Hemming; Tongbao Lin; José M Grünzweig; Kadmiel Maseyk; Eyal Rotenberg; Dan Yakir
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Characterization and expression analysis of genes encoding alpha and beta carbonic anhydrases in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Nicolas Fabre; Ilja M Reiter; Noelle Becuwe-Linka; Bernard Genty; Dominique Rumeau
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 7.228

6.  The Effect of Temperature on the Occurrence of O(2) and CO(2) Insensitive Photosynthesis in Field Grown Plants.

Authors:  R F Sage; T D Sharkey
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Influence of carbonic anhydrase activity in terrestrial vegetation on the 18O content of atmospheric CO2.

Authors:  J Gillon; D Yakir
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-03-08       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The role of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase during C4 photosynthetic isotope exchange and stomatal conductance.

Authors:  Asaph B Cousins; Irene Baroli; Murray R Badger; Alexander Ivakov; Peter J Lea; Richard C Leegood; Susanne von Caemmerer
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  The catalytic mechanism of carbonic anhydrase.

Authors:  S Lindskog; J E Coleman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Photosynthetic control of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide during the growing season.

Authors:  J E Campbell; G R Carmichael; T Chai; M Mena-Carrasco; Y Tang; D R Blake; N J Blake; S A Vay; G J Collatz; I Baker; J A Berry; S A Montzka; C Sweeney; J L Schnoor; C O Stanier
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  9 in total

1.  Effects of carbonyl sulfide and carbonic anhydrase on stomatal conductance.

Authors:  Keren Stimler; Joseph A Berry; Dan Yakir
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Sources and sinks of carbonyl sulfide in an agricultural field in the Southern Great Plains.

Authors:  Kadmiel Maseyk; Joseph A Berry; Dave Billesbach; John Elliott Campbell; Margaret S Torn; Mark Zahniser; Ulli Seibt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Estimating Mesophyll Conductance from Measurements of C18OO Photosynthetic Discrimination and Carbonic Anhydrase Activity.

Authors:  Jérôme Ogée; Lisa Wingate; Bernard Genty
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Eddy covariance carbonyl sulphide flux measurements with a quantum cascade laser absorption spectrometer.

Authors:  Katharina Gerdel; Felix Maximilian Spielmann; Albin Hammerle; Georg Wohlfahrt
Journal:  Atmos Meas Tech       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Bi-directional COS exchange in bryophytes challenges its use as a tracer for gross primary productivity.

Authors:  Georg Wohlfahrt
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 6.  Bidirectional exchange of biogenic volatiles with vegetation: emission sources, reactions, breakdown and deposition.

Authors:  Ülo Niinemets; Silvano Fares; Peter Harley; Kolby J Jardine
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 7.228

7.  Carbonyl sulfide (COS) as a tracer for canopy photosynthesis, transpiration and stomatal conductance: potential and limitations.

Authors:  Georg Wohlfahrt; Federico Brilli; Lukas Hörtnagl; Xiaobin Xu; Heinz Bingemer; Armin Hansel; Francesco Loreto
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 7.228

8.  Bryophyte gas-exchange dynamics along varying hydration status reveal a significant carbonyl sulphide (COS) sink in the dark and COS source in the light.

Authors:  Teresa E Gimeno; Jérôme Ogée; Jessica Royles; Yves Gibon; Jason B West; Régis Burlett; Sam P Jones; Joana Sauze; Steven Wohl; Camille Benard; Bernard Genty; Lisa Wingate
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 10.151

9.  Influences of light and humidity on carbonyl sulfide-based estimates of photosynthesis.

Authors:  Linda M J Kooijmans; Wu Sun; Juho Aalto; Kukka-Maaria Erkkilä; Kadmiel Maseyk; Ulrike Seibt; Timo Vesala; Ivan Mammarella; Huilin Chen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 11.205

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.