Literature DB >> 21715566

CMF revisited in the 21st century.

E Munzone1, G Curigliano, H J Burstein, E P Winer, A Goldhirsch.   

Abstract

Over the last 35 years, classical CMF (combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil) has been a milestone in the adjuvant treatment of women with breast cancer. However, after an early burst of success lasted just over 10 years, classical CMF has been supplanted by 'third-generation' regimens containing taxanes and anthracyclines. Questions have been raised in the past years concerning the true effectiveness of adjuvant CMF for specific subgroups of patients and particularly, recent retrospective data support the fact that the CMF might have a role in the treatment of patients with triple-negative breast cancer. One possible justification for supporting this role of CMF may be sought in the mechanism of action of drugs used in the regimen, as triple-negative cells may be sensitive to alkylating agents that cause double-strand breaks in DNA. The lesson learned from the CMF could lead us to identify new combinations of drugs that could include the optimal chemotherapy backbone for triple-negative breast cancer such as platinum compounds or alkylating agents or Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. In conclusion, although we have learned a lot from the use of CMF, many questions are still open and hopefully stimulate our thinking, as clinicians, leading us to find new and more effective ways to treat breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21715566     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdr309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  9 in total

1.  Why does Oncotype DX recurrence score reduce adjuvant chemotherapy use?

Authors:  Jeffrey G Schneider; Danny N Khalil
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  High incidence of methotrexate associated renal toxicity in patients with lymphoma: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Jori May; Kenneth R Carson; Sara Butler; Weijian Liu; Nancy L Bartlett; Nina D Wagner-Johnston
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2013-11-01

3.  De-escalation yes, but not at the expense of efficacy: in defense of better treatment.

Authors:  Charles L Shapiro
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2019-08-12

4.  Inclusion of Platinum Agents in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Regimens for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients: Development of GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) Recommendation by the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM).

Authors:  Maria Vittoria Dieci; Lucia Del Mastro; Michela Cinquini; Filippo Montemurro; Laura Biganzoli; Laura Cortesi; Alberto Zambelli; Carmen Criscitiello; Alessia Levaggi; Benedetta Conte; Massimo Calabrese; Alba Fiorentino; Caterina Marchiò; Corrado Tinterri; Veronica Andrea Fittipaldo; Giovanni Pappagallo; Stefania Gori
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase as a prognostic and predictive marker for basal-like breast cancer treated with cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Sayuri Isono; Makoto Fujishima; Tatsuya Azumi; Yukihiko Hashimoto; Yoshifumi Komoike; Masao Yukawa; Masahiro Watatani
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Biologic subtype is a more important prognostic factor than nodal involvement in patients with stages I and II breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Hyosun Kim; Jihyoung Cho; Sun Young Kwon; Sun Hee Kang
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 1.859

7.  Methotrexate elicits pro-respiratory and anti-growth effects by promoting AMPK signaling.

Authors:  David J Papadopoli; Eric H Ma; Dominic Roy; Mariana Russo; Gaëlle Bridon; Daina Avizonis; Russell G Jones; Julie St-Pierre
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  BRCA1 Promoter Methylation Status in 1031 Primary Breast Cancers Predicts Favorable Outcomes Following Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Olafur A Stefansson; Holmfridur Hilmarsdottir; Kristrun Olafsdottir; Laufey Tryggvadottir; Asgerdur Sverrisdottir; Oskar T Johannsson; Jon G Jonasson; Jorunn E Eyfjord; Stefan Sigurdsson
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2019-12-11

Review 9.  Do we still need breast cancer screening in the era of targeted therapies and precision medicine?

Authors:  Rubina Manuela Trimboli; Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Nicolò Matteo Luca Battisti; Andrea Cozzi; Veronica Magni; Moreno Zanardo; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2020-09-25
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.