BACKGROUND: Although childhood vaccination programmes have been very successful, there are some hard to reach minority groups that object to vaccination. The Netherlands has experienced several epidemics of vaccine-preventable diseases, confined to the orthodox Protestant minority. However, vaccination coverage in this minority is still unknown and this hampers prevention and control of epidemics. METHODS: We estimated vaccination coverage among the orthodox Protestant minority and its various subgroups (denominations), using two sub-studies with different design and study population. For both sub-studies separately, we determined overall vaccination coverage and vaccination coverage per denomination. The results were compared and discussed. RESULTS: An online survey was filled out by 1778 orthodox Protestant youngsters, invited via orthodox Protestant media using a snowball method. Next to that, results of a national sample study on vaccination were used, of which only orthodox Protestant respondents were included in our analyses (N = 2129). Overall vaccination coverage among orthodox Protestants in The Netherlands was estimated to be at minimum 60%. Moreover, in both sub-studies three clusters of denominations could be identified, with high (>85%), intermediate (50-75%) and low (<25%) vaccination coverage. CONCLUSION: The integration of both sub-studies, with their own specific strengths and weaknesses, added to our insight in the vaccination coverage in this minority. Based on these results, we recommend to focus prevention and control of vaccine-preventable diseases on the orthodox Protestant subgroups with intermediate and low vaccination coverage.
BACKGROUND: Although childhood vaccination programmes have been very successful, there are some hard to reach minority groups that object to vaccination. The Netherlands has experienced several epidemics of vaccine-preventable diseases, confined to the orthodox Protestant minority. However, vaccination coverage in this minority is still unknown and this hampers prevention and control of epidemics. METHODS: We estimated vaccination coverage among the orthodox Protestant minority and its various subgroups (denominations), using two sub-studies with different design and study population. For both sub-studies separately, we determined overall vaccination coverage and vaccination coverage per denomination. The results were compared and discussed. RESULTS: An online survey was filled out by 1778 orthodox Protestant youngsters, invited via orthodox Protestant media using a snowball method. Next to that, results of a national sample study on vaccination were used, of which only orthodox Protestant respondents were included in our analyses (N = 2129). Overall vaccination coverage among orthodox Protestants in The Netherlands was estimated to be at minimum 60%. Moreover, in both sub-studies three clusters of denominations could be identified, with high (>85%), intermediate (50-75%) and low (<25%) vaccination coverage. CONCLUSION: The integration of both sub-studies, with their own specific strengths and weaknesses, added to our insight in the vaccination coverage in this minority. Based on these results, we recommend to focus prevention and control of vaccine-preventable diseases on the orthodox Protestant subgroups with intermediate and low vaccination coverage.
Authors: Kimberley S M Benschop; Harrie G van der Avoort; Edin Jusic; Harry Vennema; Rob van Binnendijk; Erwin Duizer Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2017-06-16 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Wilhelmina L M Ruijs; Jeannine L A Hautvast; Giovanna van Ijzendoorn; Wilke J C van Ansem; Koos van der Velden; Marlies E J L Hulscher Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-06-06 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Michiel van Boven; Wilhelmina L M Ruijs; Jacco Wallinga; Philip D O'Neill; Susan Hahné Journal: PLoS Comput Biol Date: 2013-05-02 Impact factor: 4.475
Authors: L Mollema; G P Smits; G A Berbers; F R Van Der Klis; R S Van Binnendijk; H E De Melker; S J M Hahné Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 2013-08-06 Impact factor: 4.434
Authors: E M Swart; P G M van Gageldonk; H E de Melker; F R van der Klis; G A M Berbers; L Mollema Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-02-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Anita W M Suijkerbuijk; Tom Woudenberg; Susan J M Hahné; Laura Nic Lochlainn; Hester E de Melker; Wilhelmina L M Ruijs; Anna K Lugnér Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: Wilhelmina L M Ruijs; Jeannine L A Hautvast; Said Kerrar; Koos van der Velden; Marlies E J L Hulscher Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-05-28 Impact factor: 3.295