OBJECTIVE: There are few standard therapeutic options beyond second-line treatment. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of erlotinib monotherapy as third-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer without epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. METHODS: In this phase II trial, patients who did not have epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and who had previously received two cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens containing platinum were treated with erlotinib (150 mg, per os) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty patients were eligible for the assessment of efficacy and safety. Three cases showed a partial response, and eight cases showed stable disease with an overall response rate of 15.0% (95% confidence interval: 5.2-36.0%) and a disease control rate of 55.0% (95% confidence interval: 34.2-74.2%). Median progression-free survival and overall survival time were 2.1 and 6.7 months, respectively. Although dose reduction was required in one patient because of skin toxicity, grade 3/4 toxicity or pulmonary disease was not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Erlotinib as third-line therapy showed an acceptable response rate, survival time and toxicity. It could be a potential third-line therapy for patients without epidermal growth factor receptor mutations.
OBJECTIVE: There are few standard therapeutic options beyond second-line treatment. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of erlotinib monotherapy as third-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer without epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. METHODS: In this phase II trial, patients who did not have epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and who had previously received two cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens containing platinum were treated with erlotinib (150 mg, per os) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty patients were eligible for the assessment of efficacy and safety. Three cases showed a partial response, and eight cases showed stable disease with an overall response rate of 15.0% (95% confidence interval: 5.2-36.0%) and a disease control rate of 55.0% (95% confidence interval: 34.2-74.2%). Median progression-free survival and overall survival time were 2.1 and 6.7 months, respectively. Although dose reduction was required in one patient because of skin toxicity, grade 3/4 toxicity or pulmonary disease was not observed. CONCLUSIONS:Erlotinib as third-line therapy showed an acceptable response rate, survival time and toxicity. It could be a potential third-line therapy for patients without epidermal growth factor receptor mutations.