Literature DB >> 21715197

Fertility outcomes subsequent to treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy in younger Turkish women.

Volkan Turan1.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: The assessment of future fertility in patients that were hospitalized with diagnosis of tubal ectopic pregnancy.
DESIGN: Between January 1998 and September 2008, we retrospectively reviewed 219 tubal ectopic pregnancy patients who were hospitalized. The patients using contraceptive methods, underwent previous pelvic or tubal surgery, pregnancy after in vitro fertilization, over the age of 28, and extratubal ectopic pregnancies were excluded. Patients who actively attempted to conceive were included. We called all the patients to see whether they had pregnancy in 24 months, and how long they had waited for this after the operation. Overall, we could not reach 14 patients who were treated surgically (n = 9) or medically (n = 5).
SETTING: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey. PARTICIPANTS: Women aged between 18 and 28 years that were treated because of tubal ectopic pregnancy and have concerns about infertility.
INTERVENTIONS: Medical treatment with methotrexate (n = 34), salpingectomy (n = 62) salpingostomy (n = 37). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intrauterine pregnancy rates, ectopic pregnancy rates and mean time to pregnancy after interventions.
RESULTS: After questionnaire: in the methotrexate group; six of 29 (20%) had no pregnancy; 23 (79%) of them conceived, but three (10%) of the pregnancies were extrauterine. Thirty-seven patients received salpingostomy and 62 patients composed the salpingectomy group. Intrauterine pregnancy rates up to 24 months were established as 65.2% in salpingectomy (n = 55) and 60.1% in the salpingostomy (n = 35) groups respectively. No significant difference was noticed when pregnancy rates were compared among three groups (P = 0.942). Mean time to pregnancy in methotrexate group was 7.8 ± 2.2 months, and in salpingostomy and salpingectomy groups was 8.7 ± 2.2 and 9.3 ± 3.1 months respectively (P = 0.841).
CONCLUSION: Since we found no difference in terms of pregnancy rates among three groups, medical treatment appears to be more favored with early and accurate diagnosis. After salpingectomy, patients may conceive later in life when compared with other groups so selected patients should be assessed according to their age for the decision of assisted reproductive techniques.
Copyright © 2011 North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21715197     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2010.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol        ISSN: 1083-3188            Impact factor:   1.814


  11 in total

1.  The impact of expectant management, systemic methotrexate and surgery on subsequent pregnancy outcomes in tubal ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  E Demirdag; I Guler; S Abay; Y Oguz; M Erdem; A Erdem
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Fertility outcome analysis after surgical management of tubal ectopic pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jingwei Li; Kailei Jiang; Fujie Zhao
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Laparoscopic management of interstitial pregnancy and fertility outcomes after ipsilateral salpingectomy - three case reports.

Authors:  Cristina Manea; Evangelia Pavlidou; Aline Andrey Urias; Jean Bouquet de la Jolinière; Jean Bernard Dubuisson; Anis Feki
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2014-09-05

Review 4.  Comparison of the Fertility Outcome of Salpingotomy and Salpingectomy in Women with Tubal Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xiaolin Cheng; Xiaoyu Tian; Zhen Yan; Mengmeng Jia; Jie Deng; Ying Wang; Dongmei Fan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Fertility outcomes subsequent to medical and surgical treatment for ectopic pregnancy: A retrospective cohort study in Iran.

Authors:  Zahra Asgari; Venus Chegini; Reihaneh Hosseini; Mina Mohajeri; Iman Ansari
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2021-11-04

6.  Preliminary hysteroscopic tubal hydrotubation improves fertility outcomes after laparoscopic salpingotomy for tubal ampullary pregnancy.

Authors:  Qing Wu; Yanling Lin; Jing Zhang; Yun Zhou; Lifeng Chen; Tan Lin
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  FERTILITY OUTCOMES AFTER MEDICAL AND SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF TUBAL ECTOPIC PREGNANCY.

Authors:  Senem Arda Düz
Journal:  Acta Clin Croat       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 0.780

8.  Factors Associated with Ruptured Ectopic Pregnancy: A 10-Year Review at a District Hospital in Ghana.

Authors:  Promise E Sefogah; Nana E Oduro; Alim Swarray-Deen; Hanson G Nuamah; Raphael B Takyi; Mercy A Nuamah; Samuel A Oppong
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2022-03-07

9.  Risk factors and clinical characteristics of recurrent ectopic pregnancy: A case-control study.

Authors:  Xinyan Wang; Lu Huang; Yan Yu; Sheng Xu; Yucheng Lai; Wenjie Zeng
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2020-04-12       Impact factor: 1.730

10.  Fertility and reproductive outcome after tubal ectopic pregnancy: comparison among methotrexate, surgery and expectant management.

Authors:  Silvia Baggio; Simone Garzon; Anna Russo; Cesare Quintino Ianniciello; Lorenza Santi; Antonio Simone Laganà; Ricciarda Raffaelli; Massimo Franchi
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 2.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.