Literature DB >> 21715042

Hypothesis testing in animal social networks.

Darren P Croft1, Joah R Madden, Daniel W Franks, Richard James.   

Abstract

Behavioural ecologists are increasingly using social network analysis to describe the social organisation of animal populations and to test hypotheses. However, the statistical analysis of network data presents a number of challenges. In particular the non-independent nature of the data violates the assumptions of many common statistical approaches. In our opinion there is currently confusion and uncertainty amongst behavioural ecologists concerning the potential pitfalls when hypotheses testing using social network data. Here we review what we consider to be key considerations associated with the analysis of animal social networks and provide a practical guide to the use of null models based on randomisation to control for structure and non-independence in the data.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21715042     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.05.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  78 in total

1.  Feeder use predicts both acquisition and transmission of a contagious pathogen in a North American songbird.

Authors:  James S Adelman; Sahnzi C Moyers; Damien R Farine; Dana M Hawley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Unravelling the geometry of data matrices: effects of water stress regimes on winemaking.

Authors:  Hsieh Fushing; Chih-Hsin Hsueh; Constantin Heitkamp; Mark A Matthews; Patrice Koehl
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Decay of interspecific avian flock networks along a disturbance gradient in Amazonia.

Authors:  Karl Mokross; Thomas B Ryder; Marina Corrêa Côrtes; Jared D Wolfe; Philip C Stouffer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Friends of friends: are indirect connections in social networks important to animal behaviour?

Authors:  Lauren J N Brent
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Social network dynamics precede a mass eviction in group-living rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Sam M Larson; Angelina Ruiz-Lambides; Michael L Platt; Lauren J N Brent
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Agonistic reciprocity is associated with reduced male reproductive success within haremic social networks.

Authors:  Tessa K Solomon-Lane; Devaleena S Pradhan; Madelyne C Willis; Matthew S Grober
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  The use of multilayer network analysis in animal behaviour.

Authors:  Kelly R Finn; Matthew J Silk; Mason A Porter; Noa Pinter-Wollman
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  How can social network analysis contribute to social behavior research in applied ethology?

Authors:  Maja M Makagon; Brenda McCowan; Joy A Mench
Journal:  Appl Anim Behav Sci       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 2.448

9.  Establishing the reliability of rhesus macaque social network assessment from video observations.

Authors:  Eric Feczko; Thomas A J Mitchell; Hasse Walum; Jenna M Brooks; Thomas R Heitz; Larry J Young; Lisa A Parr
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  Assessing Transmission of Antimicrobial-Resistant Escherichia coli in Wild Giraffe Contact Networks.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Miller; Timothy J Johnson; George Omondi; Edward R Atwill; Lynne A Isbell; Brenda McCowan; Kimberly VanderWaal
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.